A more skeptical Modi in China after last year’s spoiled Xi visit


[TIMES Opinion Editor’s note: India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, and visited the terracotta warriors of Xian, the capital of Shaanxi, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s ancestral home province. Xi was expected to join Modi in Shaanxi, reciprocating Modi’s hosting of Xi in his home state of Gujarat last year.

Modi then goes to Beijing and China’s financial hub Shanghai. Read the complete report by Agence France-Presse in the World Section.]

New Delhi: Around the time Indian leader Narendra Modi hosted a lavish, riverfront dinner for Xi Jinping last year, about a thousand miles away Chinese troops moved into a disputed zone along the two nations’ ill-defined Himalayan border.

It was the most serious incursion in years, and overshadowed a meeting designed to boost economic ties between the world’s two most populous countries. And it will be on Modi’s mind this week during his China visit and travels to the home province of Xi, who is both president and head of the armed forces.

“I suspect that Modi’s view of China has been quite deeply coloured by the embarrassment of what happened in September,” said Rory Medcalf, head of the National Security College at the Australian National University in Canberra. “The best that can be hoped for from this visit is a renewed focus on co-existence rather than competition. There’ll be limited cooperation on some issues. There’ll be fundamental trust on none.”

Publicly, Xi and Modi are likely to build upon earlier pledges for $20 billion of Chinese investment in Indian railways, pharmaceuticals and industrial parks. Behind the scenes, strategic concerns will be paramount even as India seeks to boost economic ties with its single-biggest trading partner.

Submarines, Pakistan
In the months after the border incident, frictions rose. In March, a deep-sea Chinese submersible completed an expedition in the southwest Indian Ocean exploring for copper, zinc, lead and precious metals, stoking tensions about Beijing’s growing role in waters India has traditionally dominated. That came after China deployed a nuclear-powered submarine to patrol the Indian Ocean for the first time last year, while a diesel- powered one docked twice in Sri Lanka.

China is also pushing ahead with a $45 billion, 3,000- kilometer (1,900 mile) economic corridor through Pakistan — India’s nuclear-armed arch rival — to link its western region to a port it built on the Arabian Sea.

India, meanwhile, in January joined the US in calling for stability in the South China Sea, eliciting a sharp response from Beijing to butt out. Modi also upgraded India’s strategic partnership with Japan, which topped China with $35 billion of promised investments, and strengthened his country’s navy.

“Effectively, India picked sides,” said Shashank Joshi, senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute in London.

Border standoff
Though an outright confrontation is unlikely, the two nations are headed into a period of pricklier diplomacy and potentially greater military uncertainty.

The September standoff began when Chinese troops advanced several kilometers into northern Ladakh, an area of strategic importance nestled between Tibet and Pakistan, and lasted almost two weeks. It caught India officials off guard, and at the end of Xi’s three-day visit, Modi told a press conference that the border issue needs to be resolved.

The incident raised questions about Xi’s control over the army and the risk of rogue Chinese commanders sparking a provocation, said Gordon C. Chang, who worked as a lawyer in China and Hong Kong for nearly two decades and authored a book on China.

Upon returning from India, Xi demanded the military’s “absolute loyalty” to the Communist Party and a “smooth chain of command,” Xinhua reported, citing a meeting with the chiefs of staff of the People’s Liberation Army.

Relations to ‘remain troubled’
“It’s not clear anyone in Beijing, including Xi, has the power to strike a deal with India and, more importantly, to make that deal stick,” Chang said. “It means China-India relations will certainly remain troubled.”

Modi arrived in Xi’an on Thursday and will meet Chinese Premier Li Keqiang in Beijing on Friday [today]. On Saturday, he will meet Chinese business leaders in Shanghai. After that, he will visit Mongolia and South Korea.

His meeting with Xi took place in Xi’an, an ancient imperial capital in China’s northwest that was the eastern departure point of the Silk Road, where the two leaders were scheduled to hold their summit. Xi seeks to resurrect the trade route linking his nation to Europe and is bankrolling the project with a $40 billion infrastructure fund, which has made India apprehensive.

The border disputes won’t derail other types of cooperation between India and China, said Shen Dingli, associate dean of the Institute of International Studies at Fudan University, which Modi will visit to open a new Gandhi center.

Trade with China exceeded US$75 B
“We are pragmatic,” Shen said. “India is big. It has more needs. America, Australia, Japan and China — we can all compete to provide.”

While two-way commerce between the Asian giants exceeded $75 billion last year, India posted a trade shortfall of $42 billion on imports of heavy machinery, telecom equipment and home appliances, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That’s India’s biggest trade deficit with any country.

Overcoming mistrust about the border will be key to friendlier ties overall. The nations fought a war in 1962 and have seen sporadic border clashes over five decades.

India accuses China of occupying 38,000 square kilometers in Jammu and Kashmir, while Beijing lays claim to 90,000 square kilometers of land in the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh — leaving a total area in dispute roughly the size of England.

“If you aggregate all these factors, you have quite a difficult geopolitical context for the two countries to navigate,” Medcalf said. “One visit isn’t going to change that picture.” Bloomberg

©2015 the Mint (New Delhi) / Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Please follow our commenting guidelines.

Comments are closed.