Asean deadlocked as sea split deepens


VIENTIANE, Laos: Southeast Asian nations were deadlocked Sunday over how to confront saber-rattling in the South China Sea as pressure from Beijing again drove a wedge between countries on the region’s most contentious security issue.

The gathering in Vientiane is the first time regional players—including China and the United States—have met en masse since a UN-backed tribunal delivered a hammer blow to Beijing’s claim to vast swathes of the strategic sea.

The 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) boasts four countries who have competing claims with Beijing over parts of the strategic sea and is fiercely divided on the issue.

Rival claimants have accused China of deftly forging alliances with smaller countries like Laos, this year’s host, and Cambodia through aid and loans to divide the once consensus-driven bloc.

Chinese pressure was blamed last month for a startling show of ASEAN discord when countries swiftly disowned a joint statement released by Malaysia after an ASEAN-China meeting.

That statement had expressed alarm over Beijing’s activities in the South China Sea. Cambodia and Laos were later fingered as being behind moves to block the joint statement.

Those divisions were on stark display once more in the Laos capital with insiders accusing Cambodia of scuppering moves to include a response to the tribunal ruling in a joint communique, expected at the end of Sunday’s meeting.

“We need to put our house in order,” one diplomat involved in discussions told AFP Sunday. “But we still have not agreed on anything.”

Another ASEAN diplomat added: “We remain deadlocked. We’re back to the negotiating table.”

A working draft of the current joint communique obtained by AFP on Saturday showed the section titled “South China Sea” as blank.

The impasse in Vientiane has led to fears of a repeat of a 2012 summit in Cambodia where the bloc failed to issue a joint statement for the first time in its history because of disagreements over the South China Sea.

Competing influence
A failure by ASEAN to respond to the tribunal will do little to counter criticism that the bloc risks veering into obscurity as a talking shop with little real diplomatic clout.

The UN tribunal ruling earlier this month infuriated Beijing but was a victory for the Philippines, which brought the case, and fellow ASEAN members Vietnam, Brunei and Malaysia who also claim parts of the South China Sea.

The bloc’s paralysis on how to respond comes as China ratchets up its rhetoric and military maneuvers in the sea whilst hitting out at the US which has backed rival claimants and argued for free passage through what it considers international waters.

US Secretary of State John Kerry arrives in Laos on Monday morning. It is not yet clear whether he will meet his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi who is also attending.

A State Department official over the weekend said the US would push for ASEAN to ease tensions over the South China Sea and find common ground.

But Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin warned ASEAN against being influence by outside powers, a clear rebuke to Washington.

“They (ASEAN) should in particular guard against the intervention in regional cooperation by big powers outside the region,” he said according to the Xinhua news agency.

ASEAN boasts a diverse array of countries ranging from communist one party states like Laos, to the Islamic sultanate of Brunei, military junta-led Thailand and raucous democracies like Indonesia and the Philippines.

Its ability to deal with Beijing is seen as a litmus test for whether it can jointly confront other pressing regional challenges outside of trade.

At the summit opening Laos foreign minister Saleumxay Kommasith listed the hurdles facing the bloc as “territorial disputes, extremism and terrorism, natural disasters, climate change… refugee issues.”



Please follow our commenting guidelines.

1 Comment

  1. Stephen Pain on

    I believe that it is important to uphold the law with regard to this issue. Furthermore, rather than limiting the dispute to the region, in the interests of the environment and natural heritage, one could seek to designate all these territories “places out outstanding natural heritage” – using UNESCO to protect the islands and waters. This would scupper all building on the islands and drilling, allowing for fishing with quotas. Here then the World would have an interest in these islands – it would also demilitarize the areas too. By the same reasoning that China uses to claim sovereignty over these islands, Mongolia could claim China through the Khans. Also Tibet could claim sovereignty. What is needed in this world is less imperialism and more focus on what endangers us all, the dire state of our planet – the Earth’s sovereignty is greater than all the nations