VIENNA: Austria was preparing Saturday for a re-run of May’s presidential election in a vote that gives Norbert Hofer another shot at becoming the EU’s first far-right president.
Whether Hofer can beat independent ecologist Alexander Van der Bellen in September remains to be seen, particularly if after Britain’s Brexit vote Hofer takes the gamble of making a possible Austrian EU exit a big issue, experts said.
The new vote follows a ruling by Austria’s highest court on Friday in which Van der Bellen’s narrow May 22 victory was declared null and void.
Van der Bellen scraped home in the ballot with just 30,863 votes over Hofer of the anti-immigration Freedom Party (FPOe) for the largely ceremonial but coveted presidency.
Early results for Hofer, seen as a moderate face of the FPOe, had put him slightly ahead, but after postal votes were counted Van der Bellen was declared the winner, sparking relief among centrist parties in Austria and across Europe.
The FPOe, which is topping opinion polls ahead of the next scheduled general election in 2018 on the back of concerns about immigration, launched a legal challenge on June 8 claiming “terrifying” irregularities.
After dozens of witnesses detailed what Interior Minister Wolfgang Sobotka called widespread “sloppiness”, the court found that postal votes in 14 areas were opened too early or by unauthorized persons, and so could potentially have been doctored.
Voter turnout key
The ruling means that Van der Bellen’s planned inauguration set for July 8 has been scrapped, and sets in motion what is likely to be a hard-fought summer election battle of high drama.
Van der Bellen voter Hermann, 36, waiting for a bus in central Vienna, said he thought Van der Bellen would clinch victory again — but only just.
“I don’t think people will vote differently. The two camps are so far apart that we will get a similar result,” he told Agence France-Presse. “I don’t think the result will be any different,” agreed hairdresser Daniel Huber, 26.
But experts said that voter turnout will be key, as well as which side has more money to invest in its campaign after the high costs of the May election depleted their coffers.
“It will depend which side is the more successful at mobilizing its voters,” David Pfarrhofer from the Market polling institute told AFP. His “gut feeling” is that some typical Van der Bellen voters — younger, more educated, urban — might not vote.
Veteran expert Anton Pelinka said that Van der Bellen has a bigger task on his hands getting supporters out to vote than his gun enthusiast challenger, who walks with a cane since a 2003 paraglider accident.
“Support for Van der Bellen was much more heterogenous that for Hofer. Hofer can rely on voters from one party (the FPOe) but Van der Bellen needs a complex alliance of the center-right and the left,” Pelinka told AFP.
In May, Hofer focused on issues like wanting more direct democracy rather than the record 90,000 asylum applications in Austria last year. But he still says Islam “has no place in Austria” and opposes gay marriage.
Observers say that beneath the smooth image lurks a far-right idealogue who has already threatened to seize upon never-before-used presidential powers to fire the government if it fails to get tougher on migrants or boost the faltering economy.
And this time, after British voters’ shock decision on June 23 to leave the European Union, Hofer may decide to make a possible Austrian exit a vote-winner.
After the Brexit vote he came out in favor of a referendum if the EU fails to reform enough in the next year. Van der Bellen — a wartime child refugee from the Soviet Union — is staunchly in favor of Austria remaining in the bloc.
Political expert Hubert Sickinger said that if Hofer makes an EU exit a big issue, Van der Bellen would likely profit. “A solid majority in Austria is against leaving the EU,” he told AFP. AFP