• BLBAR is unconstitutional: Pass the BBL

    10

    THE 1987 Constitution mandates the passage of an organic act for Muslim Mindanao that provides it with genuine autonomy within 18 months of the first Congress (Section 19, Article X). Now in the 16th Congress, 27 years after the passage of the Constitution, lawmakers are yet to pass the necessary legislation.

    “The creation of autonomous regions in Muslim Mindanao and in the Cordilleras, which is peculiar to the 1987 Constitution, contemplates the grant of political autonomy, not just administrative authority, over these regions.” (Cordillera Broad Coalition vs. COA, GR. 79956 January 25, 1996 and Lilia Yaranon vs. COA, et.al., G.R. 82217 January 29, 1990.)

    Despite the passage of organic acts creating the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM), the political autonomy contemplated by the 1987 Constitution in its detailed specification under Section 20, Article X, thereof was not achieved. Such would have allowed Muslim Mindanao the power to determine what is best for its development without undue interference or control by the national government.

    This, after all, is the essence of autonomy: a devolution of responsibilities and resources with the objective of “permitting determined groups, with a common tradition and shared socio-cultural characteristics, to develop freely their ways of life and heritage, exercise their rights and be in charge of their business. This is achieved through the establishment of a special governance regime for certain member communities who choose their own authorities from within the community and exercise the jurisdictional authority legally accorded to them to decide internal community affairs. In the Philippine setting, regional autonomy implies the cultivation of more positive means for national integration.” (Disomangcop and Dimalotang vs. The Secretary of the Department of Public Works and Highways, G.R. 149848, November 25, 2004)

    The powers granted to autonomous regions are clearly laid out in Section 20, Article X. Any curtailment by the legislature of what has been mandated by the Constitution does not confer authentic political autonomy.

    This considered, proposed versions of the Basic Law for the Bangsamoro Area of Responsibility [BLBAR, for brevity], are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, insofar as they fail to provide what the Constitution mandates in Section 20, Article X. Such versions even take away powers and functions already granted to the existing ARMM. They reduce the Bangsamoro Government to an entity akin to an ordinary local government unit.

    Section 20 guarantees that the organic act of autonomous regions shall provide for legislative powers not only over administrative organization, but also for (a) creation of sources of revenue, (b) ancestral domain and natural resources, (c) personal, family and property relations, (d) regional urban and rural planning development, (e) economic, social and tourism development, (f) educational policies, (g) preservation and development of cultural heritage and (h) such other matters as may be authorized by law for the promotion of the general welfare of the people of the regions.

    The BLBAR, however, fails the constitutional mandate by insisting that control still be exercised by the National Government over the power to contract loans, credits and other forms of indebtedness with any government or private bank and other lending institutions, rendering inutile the Bangsamoro Government’s power to look for other sources of funds to sustain its programs and policies and not merely relying on the National Government’s coffers; over land registration, which can inevitably impede the full recognition of ancestral domain titles by a mere assertion of the Jura Regalia Doctrine; and over matters involving personal, family and property relations, as the BLBAR only limits applicability of the Shariah Law to matters involving persons and family relations.

    This control curtails the powers expressly granted by the Constitution insofar as the Bangsamoro Government authority to pass laws on property as well as penal statutes for promotion of the general welfare of the people in the region is concerned.

    Under the BLBAR, the National Government retains power over natural resources as it inserts its own interests in areas such as power generation and extraction of metallic minerals in the area.

    Also, economic, social and tourism development, as well as preservation and development of the cultural heritage, is still in the hands of the National Government as is the power to oversee libraries, museums and historical, cultural and archaeological sites in the area.

    The BLBAR insists that the system of education in the Bangsamoro area be consistent with the National Government’s basic state policies.

    The PNP still having primary responsibility over public order and safety for the general welfare of the people, under the BLBAR, effectively castrates capability of local law enforcement agencies to perform their tasks.

    Under paragraph (g) on peace and order, Section 21 of the Constitution is explicit that “the preservation of peace and order within the regions shall be the [responsibility of]local police agencies…” consistent with the constitutional provision on Section 6, Article XVI.

    The list goes on.

    What has been mandated by the Constitution and granted to the ARMM, the BLBAR (especially the Senate version) now takes back and what has been clearly expressed in the 1987 Constitution, the BLBAR now circumvents. These are clearly contrary to the intent of granting authentic self-governance to an autonomous region in Muslim Mindanao.

    With Congress nearing adjournment, we urge our lawmakers to heed the command of our Constitution. Give to the autonomous regions what is guaranteed them. Do not take away what has already been granted by existing laws.

    An organic law for genuine political autonomy in Muslim Mindanao as mandated by the Constitution is nearly three decades overdue! Do not pass a Basic Law that BARs them from this right. The BLBAR is unconstitutional. Pass a Bangsamoro Basic Law that implements the Constitution and enjoys the approval of the Bangsamoro people!

    Share.
    loading...
    Loading...

    Please follow our commenting guidelines.

    10 Comments

    1. The Jesuits have been kicked out of many countries throughout its history at least 80 times. It was expelled from England 5 times, and once from the Philippines during the Spanish times. They were kicked out always for the same reason, creating political intrigue. That is the context in which we should read this article. To those who doubt that the plan to Balkanize Mindanao using Islamic terrorists is not a western plot- the Western civilization being a triumvirate made up of its military might centered in Washington, financial might centered in London and religious might based in the Vatican- should read this article and see for themselves who are the real secret agents of satan in this world.

      • That’s what we call deep biases and prejudices against the fate of the Moro people. That whoever favors the resolution of the centuries old Moro quest you will automatically labelled it all bad things you can remember without distinctions even from your own leaders and people. Instead of understanding their wisdom you are maligning them. Imagine they are your own leaders in the church and how much harsh words you will accuse if it comes from the Moro People themselves. Surely you will use more evil language.

    2. Father, you are a priest, I suppose. Don’t you think you are entering a territory outside of your expertise?

    3. So much adjectives and adverbs, Mr. Tabora….. All we ask is an economic impact analysis about the BBB (it’s a Bill, not a law…. go study Pol Sci 101)…. NO ONE FROM ATENEO CAN PROVIDE an economic impact analysis…. Why?…. Because there is NO ECONOMIC impact, just selfish motives and intentions from Atenistas like you, Roxas, Aquino, et.

    4. This delusional priest still insists on his own version of reality, even claiming that the well-discredited BBL is constitutional and that the original version of BBL is the only constitutional version. This delusional priest talks nonsense! He acts as if he were an authority on the constitution and on laws when, in fact, he isn’t.

      As for the BBL being supported by the Bangsamoro people, even that is questionable. BBL is primarily supported by the MILF and its minions, but it is not supported by Lumads, Tausogs and Christians. And, most importantly, BBL is roundly rejected by the Filipino people. Especially the Filipino people living in Mindanao! That is very clear, very plain and very obvious. All surveys indicate that BBL is hugely unpopular with all Filipinos. Why don’t you heed the voice of the people, instead of resorting to highly dubious arguments about the constitution, Fr. Tabora?

    5. O, ayan, nagbaba na ng desisyon ang Atenistang si Joel Tabora. Ano pa ang hinihintay ng Kongreso Pilipinas? Paano ba…. pag pumasa ang BaLaBAR version, eh di sampa ng kaso sa Supremo Korte. At kung iyong bersiyon na isinulat ni Iqbal ang milagro-de-milagro ay pumasa, sigurado din sampa ngkaso sa Supremo Korte.
      Option 1 — baLABAR passes. Joel Tabora and others sampa ng kaso.
      Option 2 — Iqbal’s BBL version passes. Nakalinya marami-rami sampa ng kaso.

      May Option Numero Tres. The third option — nada! Do nothing. Hintayin ang susunod na administrasyon.

    6. A clear majority of the Filipnos are AGAINST the BBL…why are you pushing for its passage…

      Very weird, indeed, especially considering you are a Catholic priest…do you really know what Islam teaches…and how the bbl can pave the way for the future islamization of the country…?

      What a shame…please read The Life of Muhammad, The QURAN, the RELIANCE OF THE TRAVELER, the TREASURE OF THE WORKER, the Hadiths, etc…

      or just visit http://www.jihadwatch.com or http://www.barenakedislam.com

      You will be shocked,,,!

    7. We must remember as well it is not only Muslim people that lives in Mindanao, BLBAR secures equality among the people of Mindanao, and protect every citizens there under national government rule of law, if you think BLBAR is unconstitutional and so the BBL as more unconstitutional, we cannot entrust power in just one armed organisation, there is lot of things to consider, it is either amend or change the constitution!!

    8. It is very clear that you have business intentions with Iqbal. You are the president of ateneo de Davao, how could you right such article? Is everything now just about money? Huh father?