THE irony, of course, is that the Supreme Court cannot find 50 people who will pass a totally unnecessary psychiatric examination that will qualify them to recount contested ballots in the 2016 elections. But the same tribunal is perfectly fine with having a chief justice who can’t even hurdle a similar test.
Already have an active account? Log in here.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Continue reading with one of these options:
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details
If you have an active account, log in
here
.