I DON’T agree with the erudite--and principled—former senator Kit Tatad that the passage and enforcement of the Reproductive Health Law could cause “a Catholic revolt.” In fairness to Kit, he wrote that opinion before the Supremes released their decision to declare the law “not unconstitutional” because they struck down eight of the unconstitutional key provisions the Pro-Life movement had vehemently objected to.

The Reproductive Health Law still contains what non-lawyer I think are unconstitutional provisions. And I think that, if the congressmen and congresswomen were not blinded to the truth and common sense by International Planned Parenthood and the UN, and by Malacañang’s lucre, they would not have passed that law.

Premium + Digital Edition

Ad-free access


P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
  • Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
  • Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)

TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details