• Chevy Camaro stays true to its roots after 50th anniversary

    0

    As the 50th anniversary celebration winds down for the Chevrolet Camaro, it’s right back where it started: playing second wheel to Ford’s Mustang in the sales charts. Yet Camaro carves a distinct place in pony car Americana both past and present, renowned for stoplight sprints, countless first dates, and pacing the Indianapolis 500 nine times.

    “Customers appreciate engine horsepower and better handling — and how it makes them feel inside,” said Todd Christensen, Camaro marketing manager. “There’s a lot of passion with Camaro owners that they bring into the Chevy brand.”

    Camaro was launched for model year 1967 to counter Ford’s Mustang and give baby boomers something unique in Chevy showrooms.

    Chevrolet already offered the Corvair, Chevelle and Corvette, but the Camaro was sportier than a Chevelle, more powerful than the Corvair and was affordable, unlike Corvette. It was quick too. Car and Driver ran a 1968 Z28 0-60 mph (96 kph) in 5.3 seconds, one-tenth quicker than a Mustang with the same-sized 302 cubic-inch engine.

    Designers abandoned Coke-bottle styling with the second generation in 1970, conveying Camaro from the muscle car era, through disco, and into the Reagan administration. Styling initially cribbed Ferrari with large egg-crate grilles and fastback rooflines, but added plastic bumpers and a lot more weight to comply with safety regulations. By 1980, V-8-powered Camaros ran 0-60 mph in 9.5 seconds.

    Different from the mustang
    Times had changed, but Camaro was relatively quick and looked handsome. Unlike Mustang, which evolved from a big muscle car to the ridiculous Mustang II — the Pinto-esque Shetland of pony cars — Camaro was unswerving.

    “Among classic Camaros, I have come to appreciate the second-generation cars with their Ferrari-like front ends,” said Larry Edsall, author of “Camaro: A Legend Reborn.” “Camaro never went through a Mustang II phase.”

    The smaller, sharper third-generation 1982 Camaro needed less fuel to be fun. Base models had four-cylinder engines, but the 235-horsepower IROC filled the dreams of teenagers’ minds and walls. A sleek 1993 restyle eventually begat the 325-horsepower SS. Performance was back, but sales were kneecapped by SUV popularity, sending Camaro on hiatus after 2002. Sales were about one-third of the Mustang.

    The restrained styling of the first generation was gone, replaced by ever-longer noses, greenhouse canopies and cheap plastic. Camaro needed to return to the style and performance that originally made it popular.

    Soul-searching took eight years, but when Tom Peters’ retro-modern fifth-generation debuted for 2010, sales surpassed Mustang’s (81,299 vs. 73,716). Buyers drew quick connections to the first-generation models and throttled engines as diverse as a 30-mpg V-6 or 580-horsepower supercharged V-8. An independent rear suspension placed ride and handling beyond Mustang’s reach (temporarily).

    “The fifth and sixth generations took more of their lineage from the first generation,” Christensen said. “It got us into the pony car wars, set the standards. We sold high performance for those who value that, plus affordable models with smaller engines — same as today.”

    No automotive rivalry is more intense than Mustang vs Camaro. While the original Mustang sold 559,451 in 1965, Camaro’s first year saw just 220,906. Camaro out-sold Mustang when new models were introduced, but trailed after.

    Solid rear axles diminished ride and handling on both, but Mustang’s styling created a closer bond to the original. Virtually no design traits were shared between 1967 and 2002 Camaros. It was a car young people did not understand, and for which older generations felt no affection.

    Camaro sales led after the 2010 overhaul, but the redesigned 2015 Mustang debuted with a standard independent rear suspension and drove like an Audi. Ford vanquished its foe in 2016. Compared with the Mustang’s wide exotic stance, Camaro’s conservative restyle on Cadillac’s ATS architecture did nothing to halt the sales slide.

    “The worst thing Chevrolet could do is start discounting Camaros in order to bump sales numbers up,” said Ed Hellwig, executive editor at Edmunds.com “It needs to stick to its plan and drum up interest with small upgrades and special edition models, a tactic Ford has traditionally used with Mustang.”

    The 2018 model
    For 2018, the 1LE Track Package adds a carbon fiber wing, front dive planes and adjustable suspension.

    “Sales wars are nice, but at the expense of incentives, not so much,” Christensen said. “The car is selling at a pretty good clip. The current sixth generation went more upscale; the base price is higher. The affordable 2.0-liter engine does well, but we lost some who bought the cheaper trim before.”

    For some, there’s no substitute for a Chevrolet Camaro.

    “While Ford’s Mustang had a big head start, the Camaro was a Chevy, and no self-respecting Chevrolet fan would ever own a Ford,” Edsall said. “It went out of production for a few years, but when it came back, it established a format for the ‘modern muscle car.’”

    Camaros now handle as well as they accelerate and are loaded with technology like Bose audio, wireless phone charging, Wi-Fi hotspots, and Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Drivers continue to complain about blind spots, but rear cameras and blind-spot sensors help. Available Magnetic Ride Control adjusts the suspension in real time.

    Camaro serves as Chevrolet’s affordable sport coupe with the turbo-four at $25,905, a junior Corvette in SS trim under $38,000, and all-out track beast ZL1 for $61,140. Choose the base turbo-four that achieves 31 mpg or the ZL1’s 650-horsepower supercharged V-8 that shoves it 0-60 mph in 3.5 seconds.

    “The Camaro is one of Chevrolet’s longest-running and most well-known nameplates,” Hellwig said. “Even if people don’t buy it in big numbers, it’s a stylish high-performance coupe that makes it an aspirational car — something every brand needs.”

    No matter what, Camaro will remain true to its mission.

    “It should stand for the same things: Beautiful styling and performance value,” Christensen said. “It has to have that recipe. Tastes change, but it will remain an enthusiasts’ car.”

    CHICAGO TRIBUNE/TNS

    Share.
    loading...
    Loading...

    Please follow our commenting guidelines.

    Leave A Reply

    Please follow our commenting guidelines.