China eyes total control over HK


BEIJING: Beijing’s denial of open elections for Hong Kong’s next leader demonstrates the ruling Communist Party’s desire for complete political control and its resolve to quash any opposition, whatever the cost, observers say.

The standing committee of China’s rubber-stamp parliament on Sunday ruled out public nominations for Hong Kong’s next chief executive in 2017, with candidates for the city’s top job to be approved instead by a Beijing-backed committee.

The move by the National People’s Congress (NPC) drew fury and pledges of a mass sit-in by Hong Kong’s pro-democracy campaigners, who say Beijing is working to weed out any potential critics of the Communist Party.

But the authorities dismiss such protestations, insisting that a popular vote between the chosen contenders fulfills their pledge of “universal suffrage.”

Some experts say any expectations Beijing would loosen its grip in the former British colony — where London appointed its leaders, and which returned to China in 1997 — were unrealistic in the first place.

The decision came as Chinese President Xi Jinping rolls out a national crackdown on dissent since taking office last year, with authorities suppressing online debate and detaining activists.

“The mainland has its view, which will not be shaped by the Hong Kong people,” said Shen Dingli, a professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University.

Mainland authorities, he said, “want to have a person that will listen to Beijing.” The pro-democracy activists, he added, “cannot persuade Beijing, because these people don’t listen to Beijing.”

China’s political system is controlled by the Communist Party, and while it has long permitted elections at the village level, it typically keeps a tight grip on the process, with approved candidates often running unopposed. There are no direct polls at higher levels.

The State Council, China’s cabinet, reasserted Beijing’s control over Hong Kong in a policy “white paper” in June.

Jia Qingguo, associate dean of Peking University’s School of International Studies, said the NPC decision was “absolutely necessary” to end debate in Hong Kong.

“If the NPC makes its decision very clear, this will help stabilise Hong Kong,” he said. “The NPC is China’s most powerful organ, so when it speaks, it speaks with authority,” it added.

Crisis of governance
Residents of Hong Kong enjoy rights not seen on the mainland, including freedom of expression and assembly, as well as an independent legal system.

But there are signs some of those rights are beginning to be curtailed, especially media freedom, with physical and cyber-attacks on Hong Kong-based journalists critical of Beijing, and independent website House News shutting its doors last month.

Surya Deva, a professor at the City University of Hong Kong, said Beijing wants to “control the political governance in Hong Kong.”

But the NPC’s decision violated both the city’s Basic Law and the 1997 joint declaration between the British and Chinese governments, he argued, and was “likely to prove counterproductive.”

“Hong Kong is going to face a crisis of governance in the near future if the central government continues to behave in this way,” he said.

Implications for Taiwan
The move is also likely to have repercussions in Taiwan, to which the defeated Nationalists
fled at the end of China’s civil war in 1949 and which Beijing considers a renegade province.

Beijing has a standing offer of reunification with Taipei along the lines of the “one country, two systems” model that applies in Hong Kong.

But Lai Chung-chiang, a lawyer and rights activist who played a major role in Taiwan’s unprecedented student-led movement earlier this year, told Agence France-Presse: “The example of Hong Kong has clearly told lots of people in Taiwan that the political mechanism of ‘one country, two systems’ does not work and cannot be trusted.”

He Weifang, an outspoken law professor at Peking University, warned on his Sina Weibo microblog that “right now, before our eyes, we are obviously pushing Taiwan further away.”

Nonetheless the Party’s decision will ultimately prevail, experts say.

In Hong Kong, Occupy Central activists initially promised “wave after wave” of demonstrations, but the group’s co-founder Benny Tai admitted to Agence France Presse on Tuesday that they were powerless to overturn Beijing’s decision.

Ray Yuen, a 20-year-old student who waited outside a Hong Kong hotel to boo NPC official Li Fei, was adamant the campaigners would protest “until the end of time”­—but acknowledged that power rests in the Party’s hands.

“I believe the Chinese government will not give us true democracy, but we’re still here,” he said. “We know what democracy means, we are not sheep,” he added.

Fudan University’s Shen insisted there was no room for debate following Sunday’s announcement.

“That’s the end. No ‘next’,” he said. “Beijing announced the legal decision, so what can they do? If they protest, they will be sent to jail. This is a country ruled by law,” he added. AFP


Please follow our commenting guidelines.


  1. The political thoughts of china should be studied by us in the light of our problems regarding political dynasties, having leaders who are not competent to give us what we have been longing for. Our political system is glued to who has the MONEY. With what we are seeing now, we could see the reasons why President Marcos, declared martial law with the way our nation is moving into. If we have Barangays, at first occupied by community-development -oriented leaders sensitive to the communities needs, probably we could hope for a better future. Appointments for qualified officials should be made until we learn how to vote. Let voting on this level wait.

  2. Eventually communist mainland china will control everything. the British influence has ended; their liberal and democratic economic ways has also ended. the communist dictatorial ways and the needs of mainland china will unfortunately prevail sooner than expected! :-(

  3. Anima A. Agrava on

    Fudan University’s Shen is wrong. China is not ruled by law. It is ruled by the Chinese Communist Party and whichever faction or group of cronies wants to happen.

    • I agree with Anima, because there is no democracy in China, the government don’t care about what others say. They do not honor any promise or contract, I perceive, as was the case with what happen to the people of Hong Kong, they were promised universal suffrage. Therefore, I conclude that any contract, signed by this government is not worth the paper written on.

    • Correct! not rule of law but RULE OF IRON FIST. Since President Xi took over, the more it created problems within China and the rest of the world. Pampagulo lang ito. Siya na ba ang “3rd Christ”. Go democracy loving Chinese and Hong Kongers, fight for you wish.