• China slams Hong Kong over democracy poll

    1

    HONG KONG: Organizers on Monday urged Hong Kong’s government to take seriously an unofficial referendum on de–mocratic reform after nearly 800,000 people voted in the Chinese city, but state media in Beijing dismissed the ballot as unpatriotic.

    The poll organized by pro-democracy activists that closed late on Sunday saw more than 780,000 people voting on how Hong Kong’s next leader should be chosen, days before a planned massive protest for greater democracy in the semi-autonomous city.

    Some 88 percent of those who voted over 10 days in the refe–rendum urged the city’s law–makers to veto any political reform plans that do not meet “international standards.”

    The number of voters re–presents almost a quarter of the 3.47 million who registered to vote at elections in 2012, in a city of 7.2 million.

    “The Hong Kong government should take seriously the views of nearly 800,000 citizens,” referendum organizer Ben- ny Tai told a radio program on Monday.

    The ballot was organized by a group called Occupy Central, which threatens a mass sit-in in the business district later this year unless authorities come up with acceptable electoral reforms.

    Chinese state media slammed the vote as unpatriotic and driven by “political paranoia,” while the government of the former British colony said it “respected” the people’s views.

    The Global Times daily, which is linked to China’s ruling Communist party, said in an editorial: “The basic political requirement for Hong Kong’s chief executive is that they must love both the country and Hong Kong. The opposition has refused to accept this requirement.”

    “Some people have become frenzied. They seem civilized and rational, but their political paranoia is about to light a fuse,” it added.

    Suspected United States funding
    The China Daily called the poll an “unconstitutional political cha–rade” and accused the US of funding its organizers.

    “The US government has repeatedly expressed uncondi–tional support for this poll in addition to funding illegal activities in Hong Kong through various ‘private’ channels,” it said without giving details.

    Beijing has promised to let Hong Kong residents elect their next chief executive in 2017, but has ruled out giving voters a say in selecting candidates.

    This has fuelled fears among democracy advocates that only those sympathetic to Beijing will be allowed to stand.

    The chief executive is currently selected by a 1,200-strong pro-Beijing committee.

    “We respect the right of the people to express their views and we also understand that there are different views in society,” said a Hong Kong government spokesman in a statement late on Sunday.

    The referendum, partly online and partly at physical ballot boxes, offered voters three options on how candidates for chief executive should be chosen.

    Each would allow voters to propose candidates for the top job. All are therefore considered un–acceptable by China and the Hong Kong government, which say a nominating committee must pick candidates under the terms of the city’s mini-constitution. The winning proposal, offered by the Alliance for True Democracy, would allow the public or democratically elected lawmakers to nominate candidates.

    “Hong Kong citizens have made their voices loud and clear. They refuse [political]vetting,” Joseph Cheng, a leader of the Alliance and a member of the Occupy move–ment, told reporters.

    AFP

    Share.
    loading...
    Loading...

    Please follow our commenting guidelines.

    1 Comment

    1. China’s intolerance to democratic principles is very apparent in labeling the 800,000 recent voters who express their desire to choose their own leaders without interference from Beijing, and label them as unpatriotic is uncalled for. These people love China in general, and Hong Kong in particular, but dislikes the oppressive government.