Chinese navy chief warns US of conflict risk


BEIJING:  China’s navy chief warned his US counterpart that encounters between their forces could spiral into conflict, state media reported, two days after a US destroyer sailed close to Beijing’s artificial South China Sea (West Philippine Sea) islands.

The comments by Admiral Wu Shengli, who commands the Chinese navy, were made in a video call with US Admiral John Richardson that lasted about an hour, Beijing’s official Xinhua news agency said on Friday.

They came after the USS Lassen guided missile destroyer sailed within 12 nautical miles of at least one of the land formations claimed by China in the disputed Kalayaan (Spratly) Islands chain.

Chinese authorities monitored and warned away the vessel, but did not otherwise intervene, although Beijing later summoned the US ambassador and denounced what it called a threat to its sovereignty.

“If the US continues to carry out these kinds of dangerous, provocative acts, there could be a serious situation between frontline forces from both sides on the sea and in the air, or even a minor incident that could spark conflict,” Xinhua paraphrased Wu as saying.

“I hope the US cherishes the hard-won, good situation between the Chinese and US navies and avoids similar incidents from happening again,” Wu added.

Beijing insists it has sovereign rights to nearly all of the South China Sea, a strategic waterway through which about a third of all the world’s traded oil passes.

The disputed waters–also claimed in part or in whole by Vietnam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Brunei Darussalam–have also become the stage for a tussle for regional dominance between Beijing and Washington, the world’s two largest economic and military powers.

Mounting tensions

Tensions have mounted since China transformed reefs in the area into small islands capable of supporting military facilities, a move the US says threatens freedom of navigation.

Washington has repeatedly said it does not recognize Chinese claims to territorial waters around the artificial islands.

And on Friday, China rejected a ruling by an international tribunal based in The Hague that it could consider an action brought by the Philippines over the disputed islands.

A Pentagon spokesman said the US and Chinese commanders discussed “freedom of navigation operations, the relationship between the two navies including pending port visits, senior leader engagement and the importance of maintaining an ongoing dialogue” on the call.

A US defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Chinese had expressed no desire to cancel scheduled visits by Chinese ships to a Florida port next week, and that Admiral Harry Harris, the commander of the US Pacific Command, would still visit China.
“We look forward to continue this dialogue,” the official said.

Harris is due in China on Monday for a three-day trip including meetings with senior Chinese military leaders, US Pacific Command said, adding that “candidly addressing and managing disagreements” was among the objectives.

A US official told Agence France-Presse on Tuesday that the US Navy would send more warships to sail close to the controversial islets.



Please follow our commenting guidelines.


  1. The long time aggressor has always been the Phillipines and Vietnam, who for so long has been occupying Chinese islands and bullying Chinese fishermen while those fishermen were operating in Chinese territory. The U.S. only came in recently to try and “protect” its allies, and now is causing a lot of trouble in the South China Sea. Their strategy will of course fail, just as how they failed in the Vietnam war.

    Are you a paid spy of the People’s Republic of China or one of those Filipino-Chinese who will one day surrender the Repuiblic of the Philippines to Beijing?

  2. Vic Penetrante on

    Someone mischievous could think of something similar to “laglag-bala” to spark the conflict.

  3. China, by its unilateral action of building an artificial island and then claiming sovereignty over the West Philippine Sea in complete disregard of the rights of other claimants, is obviously the aggressor here and the main detriment to peace in the region