• Concubinage raps vs mistress necessarily implicate husband

    Persida Acosta

    Persida Acosta

    Dear PAO,
    Can I file a case against the mistress of my husband? She, herself, is married and has full knowledge that my husband is married, but she still entered into a relationship with him. I want women who have relationships with married men to learn a lesson. Thank you.     

    Dear Andrea,
    The State highly values marriage. In order to protect it, the State punishes certain forms of infidelity as defined by our laws. Since you are the wife, you may file a case for concubinage against the mistress of your husband, provided that the elements of concubinage are present in their relationship. According to Article 334 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC), a husband who shall either keep a mistress in the conjugal dwelling, shall have sexual intercourse under scandalous circumstances with a woman who is not his wife, or shall cohabit with a woman who is not his wife in any other place, commits the crime of concubinage. In this case, both your husband and his concubine or mistress will be punished under the law. You cannot file a case for concubinage against the mistress without implicating your husband.

    You also mentioned that the mistress is herself married. The RPC provides for a separate punishment for married women who shall have sexual intercourse with a man not her husband under the crime of adultery. In addition, the man may also be convicted for adultery if he has sexual intercourse with the woman even though he knows that the woman is married. While a complaint for concubinage may be filed by the wife, a complaint for adultery may be filed by the husband.

    We hope that we were able to enlighten you on the matter. Please be reminded that this advice is based solely on the facts you have narrated and our appreciation of the same. Our opinion may vary when other facts are changed or elaborated.

    Editor’s note: Dear PAO is a daily column of the Public Attorney’s Office. Questions for Chief Acosta may be sent to dearpao@manilatimes.net


    Please follow our commenting guidelines.


    1. christorey ramones on

      It’s so hard to proved….To established certain scandalous relationship is beyond our effort to proved….what are excuse are the rich…..

    2. Why cases of this kind (man is married having sexual relations with woman also married) is because they can do it much harsher and wilder without respect to refined acts while they can’t do it to their legal partners where they observe proper etiquette and respect for each other. Because of their uncontrollable emotion, they don’t care – come what may. Have strong faith in the Lord and FEAR of consequences should be the rule for everyone entering into family life.

    3. sa Pilipinas pag walang naghabla walang kaso… kaya kahit lantaran na ang adultery and concubinage wala lang… enjoy lang… kung saudi law ang susundin pagdating sa ganyang case mapuputol yan…

    4. noelravalsalaysay on

      Mayor Joseph Estrada is married with children and have concubines with children who are in politics, Many other married politicians have concubine with children but are not prosecuted. Revised Penal Code 334 is a joke.

    5. The civalised world is opposed to the way the philippines punishes adultery. They say & i agree with them that this isnt a punishable crime. You need as a country to move with the times & stop living in the middle ages.

    6. If he don’t want you anymore let him go, no sense keeping somebody that don’t love you anymore. You are just wasting your time and torturing yourself.