• Crime surge due to Aquino’s incompetence, not to death penalty’s lifting



    Last of 2 Parts

    IT will be so tragic if President Duterte gets Congress to reinstate the death penalty. The surge of heinous crimes in the country is not because of the lifting of capital punishment in 2006, but because of the incompetence of immediate past President Benigno Aquino 3rd, whose forces continue to plot against his government.

    Senate Bill 42, introduced by former police chief Senator Panfilo Lacson, reveals its gross ignorance: “The alarming surge of heinous crimes in recent years has shown that reclusion perpetua (which replaced execution in a 2006 law) is not a deterrent to grave offenders.”

    But what “recent years”’ is Lacson talking about? This logically are the past six years, from 2010 to 2015, when the Philippine National Police was under Aquino’s bosom buddy, Alan Purisima. And it was during these years that there was a near total breakdown of peace and order, with Duterte himself repeatedly saying that we practically had a narco state during these years.

    Crime statistics prove this point, and debunk the very wrong claim that the lifting of the death penalty in 2006, the index crime rate even went down from 47.5 that year to 42 in 2007 and 41 in 2008. This completely debunks Senator Lacson’s thesis that the absence of capital punishment encouraged criminals to murder and rape more.

    There was a surge in reports of index crimes in 2009, but this was mainly due to a change in the Philippine National Police’s reporting system which expanded what police precincts should report as crimes in their jurisdiction. The PNP also clamped down on many precinct commanders’ penchant to under-report crime incidences to make it appear that they were excellent law enforcers in their territory.

    Rocketed up

    As a result, the number of index crimes reported rocketed up from just 36,057 in 2008 to 301,703 in 2009 and 204,979 in 2010, probably as police precinct commanders thought it was safer to err on the side of more crimes, not less.

    The reporting system, however, seemed to have normalized in the first years of the Aquino regime, registering 218, 160, and 135 index crimes per 100,000 people in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

    However, the index crime rates surged in 2013 and 2014, to 466 and 493, respectively. Those huge numbers practically indicate a crime wave: from just 129,161 index crimes in 2012,the number more than doubled to 458,000 in 2013 and 492,000 in 2014.

    Death penalty has got nothing to do with it. Source: Philippine Statistics Authority, various years.

    This can only be explained by the breakdown of peace and order in the country, as the PNP under Purisima and Aquino lost control of the police, which likely were demoralized by the incompetence of the two. Aquino and his sidekick, Interior Secretary Mar Roxas, who was officially in charge of the PNP, were also unconcerned about the surge in crime.

    The illegal-drug problem had also proliferated, reflected in the data that homicides — committed often by drugged addicts — more than doubled, from 3,000 in 2012 to 6,500 in 2013, while incidences of physical injury zoomed from just 35,000 in 2012 to 223,000 in 2013.

    The data is indisputable. The surge in heinous crimes was not because of the lifting of the death penalty in 2006, but because we had such an inutile President, incapable of addressing the country’s perennial crime problem.

    This of course is not something unique to the Philippines. A comprehensive study in 2013 (“Relationship between police efficiency and crime rate: a worldwide approach,” European Journal of Law and Economics) evaluated the relationship between crime rates in a number of countries from 1998 to 2006.
    Police efficiency

    Its firm conclusion: It is police efficiency rather than such factors as population density, GDP per capita, or unemployment rate, that mainly determines crime rates in particular territories.

    The well-known case here is of course is New York City in the 1990s where Mayor Rudolph Giuliani’s get-tough approach to crime, as well as other major policy changes (including such simple moves as immediately erasing graffiti on walls and trains), very dramatically brought down the metropolis’ crime rate, with violent crime declining more than 56 percent.

    Before Congress pushes to restore the death penalty, which would be a step backward in our march towards becoming a civilized society and would put us in the club of such countries as North Korea, Yemen, and Iraq, it should let Duterte do his work first in addressing the crime problem.

    Capital punishment is also so against the poor who can’t afford lawyers: After the four rich brats sentenced to death for the rape of Maggie de la Riva in 1967 (three were executed, one died in prison from drug overdose), I am not aware of any rich Filipino meted the death penalty, and actually killed. Are the rich genetically saints?

    There just isn’t any proof that capital punishment deters crime. Why rush in restoring it? It will be so sad if the Senate passes a law not based on facts, but motivated by emotion or the calculation that this would appeal to voters. We’re aghast, and sick and tired of extra-judicial killings. Now you want judicial killings?

    After all, we all agree that Duterte is so totally different from his wimpy and lazy predecessor, and he can lick crime in our unlucky country.

    E-mail: tiglao.manilatimes@gmail.com
    FB: Bobi Tiglao and Rigoberto Tiglao
    Archives: rigobertotiglao.com


    Please follow our commenting guidelines.


    1. Dudley Sharp on

      Nice analysis, but

      It does not negate the fact that the death penalty is just in some cases and that the death penalty does save additional innocent lives.

      • Dudley Sharp on

        Probably not.

        The median level of education on the US death row is 12th grade.

        It is not educational achievement, but moral guidance.

    2. Kindly enlighten me on those countries having death penalty in their justice system but still heinous crimes remain rampant or their economy never made to progress.

      Do Taiwan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Singapore, Malaysia, German and Vietnam no longer have death penalty? Are these countries poor? How rampant their women are raped? How is corruption in these countries? Plunder? Graft? Scams? Extortion?

    3. The death penalty should be exclusively for the very corrupt in gov’t, only then would we see it’s impact as a crime deterrent.

    4. Death penalty isn’t a deterrent, it could even be an easy way out… of the horrific conditions inside Philippine prisons. If I were a convicted criminal of heinous crimes, I’d rather die a quick death than live for the rest of my life behind bars. So no, death penalty doesn’t make much sense.

    5. I think, kailangan muna nating tignan ang stat ng crime rate yun mga bansang may death penalty na ngayon at noong wala pa. Walang perfect na justice system, ganun din ang kaparusahan ng mga criminal kahit walang death penalty. Paano natin masisigurado after DU30 admin na ganyan parin ang condition ng mga kulungan? We have to instill fear and death penalty is the key. Kung wala nito, we endanger the public from criminals. Paano naging anti-poor kung druglords ang papatawan ng death penalty? Ganun din ang corrupt officials. Walang druglord and corrupt officials na mahirap. Mahirap bang patunayan sa court yan? Lifestyle check at bank accounts lang ay malalaman na natin. We are to ideal when it comes to human rights violation, but the truth is we have to choose between EJK or death penalty. Sa tingin ninyo titigil ang patayan? May mga sakit na kailangan ng agarang lunas dahil may time constraint. Ganun din ang drug related problems and corruption. We can’t buy more time dahil sinusugal mo ang safety ng public. Corrupt officials are one of the cause why we have poverty. Poverty is the most brutal way to kill an innocent. Ganun din ang druglords, tingin mo matatakot sila sa pang habang buhay na kulong? May katibayan rin ba tayo na titigil ang drugtrade kung walang death penalty? I think, kailangan muna nating subukan dahil maraming proseso naman ang pinagdadaanan ng isang case bago ito humantong sa death penalty.


      It is doubtful Duterte can ever control crime. It was a media hype when he was featured to be a crime fighter. So much still remains to be seen.

    7. “The surge of heinous crimes in the country is not because of the lifting of capital punishment in 2006, but because of the incompetence of immediate past President Benigno Aquino 3rd, whose forces continue to plot against his government.”

      What is Pres. Duterte waiting for? Charge Noynoy now and jail him. Noynoy is silent now, but when he’s got an opportunity and he sees the Duterte administration crumbling down soon, Noynoy will suddenly be visible again and as if he’s a knight in shining armor, Noynoy will lead the opposition, asking for Duterte to step down.

      • unfortunately being a lazy and incompetent govt worker is not a crime. just look around, heaps of them.

    8. The statistics in this article supporting the opposition on death penalty makes a lot of sense. Particularly, the fact that it’s anti-poor considering the kind of justice system we have in the country. Any statistics on white collar crimes and corruption in the government? What’s the latest on the DAP and PDAF scandal? Actions and results on these last two will definitely convince the people that the government mean ‘business’.