DBM chief denies 2015 GAA an ‘election budget’

4

The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) on Friday shot down claims that the proposed 2015 General Appropriations Act (GAA) is an “election budget” meant to enhance the chances of administration candidates in 2016.

Budget Secretary Florencio “Butch” Abad said the proposed P 2.606 trillion national budget is a “rationalized budget” that addresses government priorities.

Social Watch Philippines Lead Convenor Professor Leonor Magtolis Briones raised suspicions that some allocations in the proposed GAA might be funneled to the campaign chest of the administration for the 2016 elections.

Briones said the budget is similar to the 2012 budget that preceded the 2013 elections.


“The government cranks up spending for infrastructure and construction the year before elections. Concrete projects create the impression of growth, though it is a challenge to sustain this growth for the next years,” she added.

But Abad refuted Briones’ claim, saying the government will immediately implement programs funded under the GAA.

“With the way we have reformed the budget process, you can implement it right away. You can implement the budget on the year it was enacted,” he told reporters.

Abad denied that a big chunk of the 2015 budget would go to vote-rich provinces.

“It prioritizes the poorest and most vulnerable localities and tailor-fits interventions according to their specific needs,” he said.

Abad explained that the budget will be allocated to support inclusive development in areas which were identified based on budget priorities framework.

The framework identifies geographical areas with corresponding strategies and interventions such as high poverty magnitude, high poverty incidence and high disaster risk.

“This is the first time in budgeting history that the budget operates in the budget framework and that is not dictated by partisan considerations,” Abad said.

He also dismissed Briones’ claims that the P501-billion lump sum and automatic appropriations in the budget were actually the President’s pork barrel.

The assessment conducted by Briones’ group of the 2015 budget found that practically half of the outlay can be considered lump sums due to the lack of details and mechanisms for clear accountability, opening it to abuse.

“How can calamity fund become pork barrel?” Abad asked.

Share.
.
Loading...

Please follow our commenting guidelines.

4 Comments

  1. Hilario Martinez on

    mr abad

    please define what a rationalized budget is. How does it look like? what are its key features? what are its major outputs that will directly impact the poor? will it reduce agricultural imports? will it increase the GRDP rates of our 12 less developed regions?
    if you can present verifiable answers to these, I will believe you

  2. We must cut the 2015 budget by 20%, from the previous year, to help the people have a clean 2016 election. Every budget proceeding an election year should be cut.

    As you can see, the proposed busget is increased by 15% (?) and half of it is lum sum, pork barrel. Do not let the proposed budget pass without correcting it.

  3. Edgar G. Festin on

    What else was he going to do, admit that Prof Liling Briones is right? Thank God for Social Watch Philippines! And Manila Times!

  4. I still believe the theory of Prof. Liling Briones. Her wisdom on budgeting, accounting, auditing and fiscal administration is no match to a “creative genius” as described by Pnoy.