• Death penalty lifting did not increase incidence of heinous crimes



    Duterte given patently false data

    First of 2 Parts
    PRESIDENT Duterte last week argued for the return of the death penalty by referring to the purported statistics reported by the Bureau of Corrections head Benjamin de los Santos in his recent testimony to the Senate.

    The bureaucrat testified: “BuCor statistics show that before the abolition of the death penalty we had 189 inmates convicted for the commission of heinous crimes. After such abolition, a staggering 6,024 were sentenced for heinous crimes, an astonishing 3,280 percent increase.”

    That’s a total lie, a patent fabrication: The Senate must cite the BuCor official for perjury, and for attempting to fool it to pass a law re-imposing the death penalty by presenting false information.

    There is no such data: Neither the BuCor nor its mother agency, the justice department, has collated information on convictions on heinous crimes.

    The only BuCor data that could approximate the number of “inmates convicted for heinous crimes” are the number of its yearly admissions of convicts. The number of those convicted of heinous crimes—such as murder, rape, and kidnapping— may be estimated based on its data that 48 percent of convicts in its prisons are “maximum security” inmates.

    (To clarify, the BuCor under the justice department is charged with supervising six national prisons, including the biggest, the national penitentiary at the New Bilibid Prison, with its inmates consisting of those already convicted and with sentences of more than three years. On the other hand, the inmates in the jails of the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology, which is under the Philippine National Police, are those still on trial and with convictions of less than three years.)

    As the data below show, after the June 2006 ban of the death penalty, there was very minimal increase in the number of those convicted for murders and rapes, the two most frequent crimes punishable by death, with very little deviation from the yearly average of 2,558 incidences.

    The slight increases are due of course to the increases in our country’s population, which grew from 87 million in 2006 to 101 million in 2015. Indeed, for both 2016 when there was no death penalty, and 2005 when there was, the heinous crime rate per 100,000 population, was the same, at 2.8.

    Lifting of capital punishment in 2006 had no impact on incidence of murder and rape.

    The data therefore indisputably shows that the abolition of the death penalty had not encouraged more heinous crimes, contrary to the claims of the BuCor official and proponents of the death penalty.

    The Philippine data isn’t at all surprising: rigorous, scientific studies show that the death penalty has no impact on the incidence of heinous crimes. Two studies in the United States that claimed to prove that the abolition of the death penalty increased murder rates in certain US states, were later proven to be “fundamentally flawed” by that country’s National Research Council.

    In fact, murder rates from 1900 to 2010 in American states in which there is no death penalty were even lower than in states with capital punishment. A 2009 survey of criminologists showed that over 88 percent believed that the death penalty was not a deterrent to murder.

    The issue is really so commonsensical. As Amnesty International has pointed out: “The threat of execution at some future date is unlikely to enter the minds of those acting under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol, those who are in the grip of fear or rage, those who are panicking while committing another crime (such as a robbery), or those who suffer from mental illness or mental retardation and do not fully understand the gravity of their crime.”

    Same finding here: Death penalty no impact on murder rates.

    In essence, the death penalty has been a remnant from our civilization’s violent past, unenlightened by humanity’s higher values, mainly the recognition of the mystery and wonder of a human life, that took more than a thousand years to develop. We have only learned in the past 50 years that a human does not totally have free will, with his baser instincts capable at times of completely taking over his reason or values, even as we have to pretend we are captains of our souls.

    From being a penalty imposed by all nations in the past, 140 nations have abolished it in law and in practice, and only 54 retain it in practice. Only the US (31 out of its 52 states) among the Western nations retain it, and not even “violent” Russia in practice.

    It’s not a coincidence that many of the American states that do have the death penalty are those where Christians who take the Bible literally dominate.

    Excluding in the discussion China and other nations whose cultures are still dominated by the primacy of the group — as in an ant colony — rather than the individual, the most important reason why there is still capital punishment in this day of enlightenment and age of reason will surprise you.

    It is religion, particularly Christianity and its offshoot, Islam. Christianity and Islam have molded most of humanity’s values for at least a thousand years, and these two have always brainwashed people to believe that God himself sees vengeance as a value to be upheld, that an eye must be paid for an eye taken, a life for a life extinguished.

    As late as 1952, Pope Pius XII even made the ridiculous argument that the “State does not dispose of the individual’s right to life.” Rather, he argued, “in expiation of his crime, [the criminal]has already disposed of his right to life.” Until 1969, the Vatican City’s statutes had capital punishment — for the crime of attempting to assassinate the Pope.

    Pope Francis has stated that he is against the death penalty, but that it is his personal opinion and he is appealing for a consensus to end the death penalty on the ground that it is “cruel and unnecessary.” The Vatican had officially supported the 2015 United Nations campaign against the death penalty.

    But believe it or not, Catholic dogma still doesn’t see anything wrong with capital punishment as a right of the state to defend itself. No wonder the support of many, if not most, Filipinos for the return of capital punishment in this unlucky, dominantly Catholic nation.

    We will be the first country to re-impose the death penalty, and the second time around after the ex-general Fidel Ramos rammed a law through Congress in 1993 authorizing it. Gloria Arroyo abolished it in 2006. Duterte wants it back, after given false information.

    What a country that keeps changing its mind on such a fundamental issue.

    (On Friday, it was not the 2006 abolition of the death penalty that encouraged more crimes, rather it was the incompetence of the BS Aquino III regime and I will show that with facts, figures, and logic.)

    E-mail: tiglao.manilatimes@gmail.com
    FB: Bobi Tiglao and Rigoberto Tiglao
    Archives: rigobertotiglao.com


    Please follow our commenting guidelines.


    1. The most heinous plunder of all that deserves the death penalty is the stealing of multi-millions to billions of pesos worth of aid intended for disaster victims, like what happened after typhoon Yolanda when donations went missing or were substituted for expired goods.

      Large scale corruption in gov’t disaster prevention projects must be included as a death penalty offense, as it is the heartless profiteering over the people’s misery in times of severe calamity. Such an evil crime results to increased suffering and even death of multitudes from starvation and medical neglect.

      Murderers and rapist don’t even come close to the crime plundering from victims of disasters.

    2. Maybe because these crimes are already saturated. But there is so much increase in plunder, to amazingly bold levels of magnitude, from millions to billions, maybe trillions for ERC-FIT.

      The DAP, the LTO, LRT, ERC-FIT, comelec-smartmatic, to name a few.

    3. Its very simple appraisal.. why DEALTH PENALTY has enormous obstacle to battled.


      1. Many of the governing body are favoring only them selves. (self interest)
      2. 70% (more or less) of the governing body want the position in order to stay in the clan of power.
      3. 70% (more or less) of the governing body are non patriotic.

      GO, GO, DU30….change it / change them….we support you…

    4. This is from Vatican. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2267 Assuming that the guilty party’s identity and responsibility have been fully determined, the traditional teaching of the Church does not exclude recourse to the death penalty, if this is the only possible way of effectively defending human lives against the unjust aggressor. Pope John Paul II advocated incarceration in lieu of the death penalty whenever possible. Meaning death penalty is allowed. St. Thomas Aquinas, (one of the founding fathers of Catholicism) was a vocal supporter of the death penalty. Based on the theory (found in natural moral law), that the state has not only the right, but the duty to protect its citizens from enemies, both from within, and without.”The life of certain pestiferous men is an impediment to the common good which is the concord of human society. Therefore, certain men must be removed by death from the society of men”. The argument that evildoers should be allowed to live in the hope that they might be redeemed was rejected by Aquinas as frivolous. Bible verses: I Corinthians 5, 6: “You know that a little leaven corrupts the whole lump of dough?” and I Corinthians 5, 13: “Put away the evil one from among yourselves”; Romans 13,4: “[it is said of earthly power that] he bears not the sword in vain: for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath upon him that does evil”; . I could include Pope Pius and Pope Benedict XVI views on death penalty if you like.

      • The problem with this argument is who in this country can determine guilt and responsibility in a transparent , believable manner? PNP, Judiciary and the law system are in themselves some of the most corrupt, untrustworthy agencies in the Philippines. Who would trust them to give a fair trial and sentence (death) when any of they’re family members were the accused?

    5. In Muslim countries where gays doing gay’s acts are punished with death penalty has virually no gays. In countries where cutting of fingers of convicted thieves or robbers is the penalty, those crimes are virtually non-existent. Then you say death penalty does not deter a criminal from committing a heinous crime?
      If I rape a woman I’ll be punished with life imprisonment but if I kill my victim I might get away with it because there is no witness and so I decided to kill her because anyway, the penalty that I’ll get is the same. Ditto with other complex crime like robbery with murder, arson with homicide, etc. The non-imposition of death penalty serve as an ‘incentive’ to commit more or graver crimes. If the penalty for killing one person is the same as killing hundreds, a desperate person may do the latter.

      • Absolutely correct, those senators who are against with DEATH PENALTY are protecting them selves..because in future they cant afford to be corrupt… because if there will be punishment like this definitely they cant plunder anymore.. NO MONEY…. NO NEW HONEY…thats it..

      • Sam de asis; you must have many sisters and brothers, because one person can not be that ignorant by himself.
        Lots of gays in muslim countries, but unlike here in ph they don’t put them as host in tv shows