• Climate change

    Experts: World headed for too-high 2.7 Celsius warming

    1

    PARIS: Earth could warm 2.7 degrees Celsius this century, warned a review Thursday which judged national carbon-cutting pledges insufficient to stave off worst-case-scenario predictions for climate change.

    |The goal of limiting overall planet warming to 2.0 C (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) from pre-industrial levels is still out of reach, the Climate Action Tracker (CAT) analysis found — though there are signs it may be inching into view.

    In rare good news, 2.7 C was a “significant improvement” from the CAT’s previous forecast of 3.1 C by 2100, said a statement issued by the quartet of research bodies which compiled the report.

    But the pledges submitted ahead of an informal October 1 UN deadline would still yield “global warming well above the 2.0 C limit set by the global community,” said a CAT statement.

    “This reflects the less than sufficient climate targets submitted by many governments.”

    The UN’s climate science panel says a world even 1.0 C or 2.0 C warmer would face “considerable” risks, including more severe floods and droughts, a land-gobbling sea-level rise, the spread of disease and food shortages — all of which may increase global political instability.

    The tracker analyzed country plans for curbing climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions, known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions or INDCs, which will form the backbone of a universal climate rescue pact to be inked at a UN conference in Paris in December.

    Just over 140 countries out of 195 negotiating the global agreement, which will enter into force in 2020, had filed their contributions by Thursday — setting either five- or ten-year emissions targets for themselves.

    Representing nearly 80 percent of global emissions, the pledges included top three polluters China, the United States and the 28-member European Union.

    The CAT prediction also included estimated numbers for fourth-placed India, which has not yet formally pledged, but has made public statements on its intentions.

    This was the first time since 2009, when the CAT analysis began, that the forecast has dipped under 3.0 C — a change caused in large part by China’s pledge, which could see its emissions of carbon dioxide, the most ubiquitous greenhouse gas, peak in the late 2020s.

    “The INDC process has clearly led to progress,” said Bill Hare, a founder of Climate Analytics, one of the research groups which contributes to CAT.

    “But it is clear that in Paris governments must consider formally acknowledging that their first round of climate plans for 2025 and 2030 will not hold warming below 2C.

    Regular ramp-up needed

    Climate envoy Laurence Tubiana of France, which will host the November 30-December 11 UN haggle, said the pledges to date marked a “very important step — we are nearing the scenario we had hoped for.”

    Looking forward, she added, “the essential part is that we put in place rules so that countries can ramp up their contributions regularly” after the Paris conference, she told AFP.

    The CAT analysis looked at countries responsible for over 70 percent of global emissions and extrapolated for the rest.

    To get on the path to 2 C, annual greenhouse gas emissions would have to be 11-13 billion tonnes lower in 2025 than those pledged, and 15-17 billion tonnes lower in 2030, it found.

    Based on current INDCs, emissions would be 52-54 billion tonnes of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2e) in 2025 and 53-55 (GtCO2e) in 2030 — more than today’s estimated 48 GtCO2e per year.

    The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), recommends slashing emissions by 40-70 percent by 2050 from 2010 levels and to near zero or below by 2100 for any chance at 2 C.

    It was “not very likely” that submissions by countries which have not yet filed their pledges would get us closer to 2 C before Paris, Hare told AFP.

    “Falling below 3 C is symbolically important, but insufficient,” added Jean Jouzel, IPCC vice president.

    “The further we are from 2 C, the more difficult it will be to adapt (to climate change-induced challenges), especially for developing countries,” he told AFP.

    The planet is already 0.8 C warmer on average than at the start of the Industrial Revolution in about 1760.

    AFP

    Share.
    loading...
    Loading...

    Please follow our commenting guidelines.

    1 Comment

    1. No country’s plan for climate change can come close to being adequate if it does not provide for a third of our electric power coming from nuclear power plants.
      Nuclear is also our ticket to clean transportation because we can make abundant electricity for battery cars — as well as abundant clean hydrogen for hydrogen cars — and do so during off-peak times.
      And we got it wrong on battery cars. There is no electric grid around that can sustain their tremendous load of charging them day after day — even in relatively small numbers. If electric cars have fast charging batteries, their power draw on the grid would be so high they would regularly put the lights out.
      Hydrogen cars on the other hand store their energy in the fuel molecules themselves — eliminating the need to transfer huge amounts of raw power all at once. This distinction alone makes hydrogen the workable solution to our carbon-plagued transportation. The proven way to make the high volume of hydrogen and electricity we need is with nuclear power plants. So we had better start building them fast because they take decades to finish — and then some.