• Fast-track weight loss no less effective than slow: study


    PARIS: Weight-loss guidelines have long counseled dieters that kilos shed too quickly are likelier to creep back than those lost at a slower pace.

    But an Australian study, published on Wednesday, says this is wrong.

    Over the long term, fast track and slow-track dieters are equally likely to regain most of the weight they lost, according to a paper published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology.

    Research led by Joseph Proietto of the University of Melbourne divided 204 obese men and women into two groups.

    One group entered a weight-loss program of 12 weeks, the other a more gradual 36 weeks.

    The 12-week group were restricted to a diet of 450-800 calories per day, while the other group had their energy intake reduced by about 500 calories per day.

    Those who lost 12.5 percent or more of their bodyweight from both groups were then placed on a three-year maintenance diet.

    By the end of the trial, individuals in both groups had regained some 71 percent on average of the kilos they had shed.

    “By contrast with the widely-held belief that weight lost rapidly is more quickly regained, our findings show that regain is similar after gradual or rapid weight loss,” the team said.

    “Our data should guide committees that develop clinical guidelines for the management of obesity to change their advice,” they added.

    Dieters are generally told that a weight loss tempo of no more than 500 grams (1.1 pounds) per week is best.

    The researchers noted some interesting short-term differences in how the two groups responded.

    Among the fast-dieting group, more achieved their weight loss target—81 percent compared to half of the other group—and fewer left the program.

    These initial successes may be partly explained by a process called ketosis which kicks in with low-calorie intake—the body burns fat to produce breakdown products called ketones, which are known to suppress hunger.

    “Losing weight quickly may also motivate participants to persist with their diet and achieve better results,” said the authors.

    But this made no difference in the longer term, with the weight piling up again over time.

    “For weight loss, a slow and steady approach does not win the race,” Corby Martin and Kishore Gadde of the US-based Pennington Biomedical Research Center said in a comment.

    “The myth that rapid weight loss is associated with rapid weight regain is no more true than one of Aesop’s fables.”

    In comments distributed by the London-based Science Media Center, nutritionists said the study reiterated that sustained weight loss remained a challenge, however it is achieved.

    “While weight loss is hard, weight loss maintenance is even harder,” said Nick Finer, an endocrinologist from University College London Hospitals.



    Please follow our commenting guidelines.


    1. I have no intention of knowing my weight, nor do I really
      care. This will help eliminate the unconscious
      snacking that is so much a part of being overweight. Should I expect
      to see the measured copper content of my.

    2. A typical bathroom weight scale may deliver inaccurate guidance
      given that an individual can be slightly obese and nonetheless regarded as in good health.
      When deciding upon a scale, you should make sure that the platform is big enough for your needs.
      Note that doing the daily cleaning routine cleaning work to
      prevent the production of dirt and found that dirt should be removed in time,
      do not let it form a old scale and thick dirt.