HANGZHOU, China: The Group of 20 agreed at their summit in China that refugees are a global issue and the burden must be shared, the leaders declared in a joint communique on Monday (early Tuesday in Manila).
“Worldwide massive forced displacement of people, unprecedented since the Second World War, especially those generated from violent conflicts, is a global concern,” they said at the end of their two-day gathering in the scenic eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou.
The Group of 20 — which together account for 85 percent of the world economy and two-thirds of its population — reiterated their call from last year’s summit in Turkey for “global concerted efforts in addressing the effects, protection need and root causes of refugee crisis to share in the burden associated with it.”
The group called for strengthening humanitarian assistance for refugees and invited all states “according to their individual capacity” to ramp up aid to international organizations assisting affected countries.
A steady stream of refugees has flowed into Europe over the last year, largely fleeing the civil war in Syria.
European Union President Donald Tusk said on the first day of G20 Europe was “close to limits” on its ability to accept new waves of refugees and urged the broader international community to shoulder its share of the burden.
The issue has become a political flashpoint for leaders in the region as a series of Islamist terror attacks and rising anti-globalization sentiment have combined to create an increasingly inhospitable environment for refugees from the brutal conflict.
The group’s communique called for increasing efforts to “find durable solutions,” particularly for “protracted refugee situations.”
Earlier a senior EU diplomat told Agence-France Presse the G20 was making a strong stand, and had overcome initial reluctance from Argentina and Brazil on including the issue in the communique, but noted it was not a binding commitment.
“There is a difference between commitment and enforcement… at least, it’s here,” he said.
“Of course we have to take into account the fact that it is a sovereignty issue… it is not an obligation, but the burden-sharing is there,” he added.