• A GOOD TIME FOR ENABLING REFORMS

    If we choose our next leader well

    8

    President Aquino’s term is still winding down; but offhand I’d say he could have easily done worse. Despite the pork-barrel horrors in the Senate, exemplified by the Napoles scams, no scandal has ever been attached to his office. He has kept up the growth of the formal economy that began, off and on, in the 1990s; he has apparently even raised our country’s global competitiveness to a modest degree.

    Amid the continuing dysfunction of the political departments, his technocrats have kept the finance and foreign-trade ministries running professionally. The experts agree the economy’s short-term outlook is good, though its basic problems persist.

    Setting off key reforms
    So that our need is as grave as ever for what Gen. ‘JoeAl’ Almonte calls “enabling reforms”—restructuring that would set off further restructuring, until it has transformed key aspects of our national condition.

    An iconic example of such far-reaching transformation dismantled the PLDT monopoly in 1995. It set off the telecoms revolution that has now made our country the largest business-process-outsourcing (BPO) center in the world.

    The election of a new administration is always a good time to try out basic reforms. These are best attempted when things are going relatively well, and people are most receptive to change.

    Raising state capacity
    What aspects of national life do we need to transform? So many of the Philippine state’s features need reforming, one hardly knows where to begin.

    But in my view we can no longer put off serious efforts to raise state capacity. Public administration is failing. Corruption is matter-of-fact, and civil servants are apathetic, where they’re not themselves venal.

    Despite successive years of high growth, poverty remains stubbornly high; and inequality—the worst in East Asia—should be a national embarrassment.

    As the SWS surveys reveal, far too many families still suffer episodes of hunger. Rural poverty is put at five times that of Malaysia, and almost thrice that of Indonesia and Thailand.

    Yet, as the economist Harry Oshima had noted, we also have Southeast Asia’s richest—and most profligate—elite. The luxury-cars Bentley and Ferrari have opened Metro-Manila showrooms; and a Hermes outlet sells Birkin handbags—for half a million pesos minimum, and a waiting list a full year long.

    Premature democracy
    Our basic problem of a weak state trying to govern what the Makati elder, Washington Sycip, calls a “premature democracy” is left over from colonial times.

    Until now, our fragmented political system hampers our ability to focus on national purposes and shared social goals. Government still is unable even to enforce all its writs, control crime and guarantee the civil liberties.

    We continue to be led not by principled parties but by self-interested factions. So that every time a presidential term ends and a new one begins, we must start from scratch.

    Virtually alone among our neighbor states, we’ve not even completed agrarian reform. (Thailand, too, still has tenure problems: one reason for its periodic coups.) We took 15 years to raise “sin taxes” and 18 years to pass a reproductive health law.

    The tax effort remains below the Asean average and government’s own target. But the state apparently also gives away “unnecessary” business incentives worth P100 billion a year. And though the Aquino administration since it took office has filed more than 200 cases against tax cheats, it has yet to win a single conviction.

    Perhaps the next administration should look to Brazil’s “pockets of efficiency” model. These are task forces created outside the civil service and accountable to the executive. They oversee specific development projects—such as the prosecution of tax cases—on higher compensation schemes but without acquiring tenure.

    Between rival powers
    Once our island isolation had secured us from the contagions of East Asia. But now our foreign-policy commitments have enmeshed us in a conflict over the China Sea between a hegemonic America and a rising China.

    Like the other coastal states involved, we’ve let the US use our military bases for surveillance flights and “show-the-flag” sailings off the disputed islets. One can only hope our policymakers have thought this up-front posture through.

    In recent weeks, the Chinese have deployed missiles on the Paracels off Vietnam—raising the likelihood of a flash conflict. Over the foreseeable future, we must expect this big-power game to ebb and flow—since it’s really about long-term influence over East Asia and the West Pacific.

    Growth is never enough
    We can do little to soften the impact on our security of a US-China confrontation on the South China Sea. But we can begin to face up to the scale and immensity of our country’s poverty.

    As we should have realized by now, growth by itself is never enough. If it is to spread sufficiently, it must be accompanied by redistributive policies, such as agrarian reform; and social safety nets, such as an effective minimum wage. Our lack of these instruments has restricted the poverty-reducing effects of economic growth on the national welfare.

    Hard-edged capitalism
    We need to soften the hard edges of our kind of capitalism. Since we have an army of the unemployed, workers on their own have no bargaining power. Special interests have such a lock on public policy that already people fear the reforms Aquino has managed may be eased away by his successor.

    Even Aquino’s key anti-poverty program—the Conditional Cash Transfers (CCTs)—is legalized only by an administrative order, and not institutionalized by law, so that conceivably his successor can just let it fade away.

    Affirmative action
    Both state and corporate intervention has favored the regions clustered close to the largest cities. So that while these favored areas may be generating “spread effects” in nearby regions, those communities more distant are suffering “backwash”—as the formal economy sucks away both their stores of capital and their most entrepreneurial inhabitants.

    To counter this backward-flowing current, government must begin to practice time-bound “positive discrimination” on behalf of ethnic minorities and the poorest portions of our people. Some 12 million of our country’s 50 million self-identified poor are concentrated in only four regions—the ARMM, Caraga, Bicol, and Samar-Leyte.

    Over these next 7-10 years, we should increase social spending disproportionately in their favor—until their levels of health, education, and infrastructure equal those of the average region.

    Funding shouldn’t be a major problem. Just by rolling back the fiscal incentives Congress has granted lavishly to special interests, the state could regain billions in yearly revenue it should then return to its neediest constituencies.

    Share.
    loading...
    Loading...

    Please follow our commenting guidelines.

    8 Comments

    1. Is it still possible for us to choose our leaders?

      I asked because we highly suspect that the Hocus-PCOS was already preprogrammed on what candidates will win. Just like the rigged elections of 2010 and 2013

      If this is the case, then this advice in choosing a leader is considered “moot and academic”

    2. The same feather flocks together. I dont think Roxas will win in this coming election. All what he says is non-sense. We need a leader who has a vision what he will do in the next six years. Iyon bang may project ka na early start date and early date finish.. This is what we need..BBM is the best for Vice President.

    3. The half hearted praise for Aquino apart, this is a good summary. Its a good agenda for an incoming president, but who really thinks any of the candidates could deliver on this, even if they wanted to, which most of them do not!

    4. With due respect but Aquino’s office has IN FACT been linked to the scandal of the biggest presidential “pork barrel” in all of PH history, that not even the much maligned former Pres. Marcos could match. This is no other than the DAP that was held unconstitutional by the SC no less in Araullo v. Aquino.

    5. Widespread poverty is the country’s main problem, and it is caused largely by the 12% value added tax which makes practically everything beyond the reach of the masses, and the goverment’s privatization program which makes vital public services (such as provision of water, light, roads, etc) very expensive for Juan de la Cruz. The next President can immediatly reduce poverty by abolishing, if not reducing the 12% VAT, and taking over all the PPP projects and reducing, if not scrapping, the high cost of these public services the government is mandated to provide.

    6. President Aquino’s term is still winding down; but offhand I’d say he could have easily done worse. Despite the pork-barrel horrors in the Senate, exemplified by the Napoles scams, no scandal has ever been attached to his office.
      —————————————————
      Apparently controlling the Dept of Justice, the Ombudsman office, the television networks, the Supreme Court and a congress that sold their souls for the pork barrel money tends to keep the heat off.
      The people have to look to foreign media as only a few newspapers inside the country print the truth about Aquino and his criminal network.

      • Leodegardo Pruna on

        The scandals of the Dept.of Agriculture, the Dept. of Transportation, etc. are offices under the President. The fact that even with so much complaints he has not raise his hand to stop them is sign enough that his office is saddled with anomalies. He cannot escape this much so the unconstitutional disbursement he has allowed. Definitely, P-Noy has lot of answer and might even suffer much more than what he did to GMA who up to now has not been proven guilty by this vengeful administration. God save the Philippines.

    7. no scandal has been attached to his office for now coz he still the president wait until next administration unless roxas win.puro tao niya ang nasa cabinete