checkmate

Support for illegitimate child falls on his parents



Dear PAO,
Good day! I have a question about the right to support of an illegitimate child. I am a married woman and my husband has an illegitimate child.

My question is, do I have the obligation to support his illegitimate child simply because we are married? Or is it just my husband’s obligation? Thanks a lot.
Arlene

Dear Arlene,

Technically, you do not have the obligation to give support to your husband’s illegitimate child. Article 195 of the Family Code of the Philippines lists the persons obliged to support each other, namely:

1. Spouses;

2. Legitimate ascendants and descendants;

3. Parents and their legitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter;

4. Parents and their illegitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter;

5. Legitimate brothers and sisters, whether of the full or half-blood.

By providing a list, the Family Code in effect, limits the obligation and right to support of a person. Clearly, the list does not include the spouse of a parent, like you. Hence, you have no obligation to support his illegitimate child. Such obligation falls on his/her parents.

However, Article 197 of the Family Code of the Philippines provides additional guarantee on the right to support of an illegitimate child, which results in obliging the spousal property regime to advance the support. It states:

“For the support of legitimate ascendants; descendants, whether legitimate or illegitimate; and brothers and sisters, whether legitimately or illegitimately related, only the separate property of the person obliged to give support shall be answerable provided that in case the obligor has no separate property, the absolute community or the conjugal partnership, if financially capable, shall advance the support, which shall be deducted from the share of the spouse obliged upon the liquidation of the absolute community or of the conjugal partnership.

This means that the absolute community or conjugal partnership may be held liable for the support of an illegitimate child. But it is subject to the condition that the person obliged to give support has no separate property, meaning he/she does not have the resources to give support.

Moreover, any support for an illegitimate child furnished or advanced by the absolute community or conjugal partnership shall be considered as a debt of the spouse obliged to give support which will be paid or settled upon the dissolution of the property regime by deducting it from his/her share in the absolute community or conjugal partnership.

Applied in your case, it should first be shown that your husband does not have the means to provide support for his illegitimate child before your absolute community or conjugal partnership property may be required to give support. And second, any support for the illegitimate child to be taken from your property regime will be considered as a debt of your husband to the absolute community or conjugal partnership and will be settled upon dissolution.

Note that the support will be taken from the community property or conjugal partnership, and not from your separate property.

In sum, the obligation to support an illegitimate child primarily falls on his parents, but should the latter be incapable to give support, the community property or conjugal partnership may be required to advance the support.

We hope that the foregoing discussion answered your question. On a last note, please be reminded that the opinion given above is strictly based on our understanding of the facts you have given. Any change in the facts or other circumstances will require a reassessment of the problem.

Dear PAO

File an ejectment case for unlawful detainer to oust lessee

Published : Thursday January 17, 2013   |  Category : Dearpao   |  Hits:217
By : PERSIDA ACOSTA

Dear PAO, Please give me advice on how to properly eject lessees because of failure in settling payments. The lessees have refused to vacate the property that has been deemed forfeited as per contract rules. Read more

Worker regularity based on nature of job, not the written employment contract

Published : Wednesday January 16, 2013   |  Category : Dearpao   |  Hits:323
By : PERSIDA ACOSTA

Dear PAO,I have been working in this beverage company since 2010 under one-year contract and was renewed yearly up until this year. Read more

Deceased SSS member’s family gets death and funeral benefits

Published : Tuesday January 15, 2013   |  Category : Dearpao   |  Hits:651
By : PERSIDA ACOSTA

Dear PAO,What benefits may the family of a deceased SSS member get?Espy   Read more

Leave benefits for women who undergo surgery

Published : Monday January 14, 2013   |  Category : Dearpao   |  Hits:413
By : PERSIDA ACOSTA

Dear PAO,I recently found out that I have a condition, which requires the removal of both of my ovaries. My doctor advised me to take several weeks off from my job to recuperate. Read more

After a year of service, worker entitled to five-day service incentive leave with pay

Published : Sunday January 13, 2013   |  Category : Dearpao   |  Hits:412
By : Persida Acosta

Dear PAO,I am a regular employee but my employer does not give us service incentive leave. What shall we do? Jun Read more

Hosting Powered and Design By: I-MAP WEBSOLUTIONS, INC