THE RESULTS of a matched-pair comparison of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer predominately affecting the liver, for whom all chemotherapy options had been exhausted, showed that the addition of radioembolization using SIR-Spheres significantly prolonged survival compared with best supportive care (BSC) alone.

 
The study, published in October’s edition of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, showed that median overall survival was more than doubled in patients receiving radioembolization plus BSC versus BSC alone: 8.3 months vs. 3.5 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.26; 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.48; P<0.001). A multivariate analysis confirmed that radioembolization was the only significant predictor for prolonged survival among all the baseline parameters investigated (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16–0.55; P<0.001).
 
“Radioembolization significantly prolonged overall survival compared with supportive care alone in a well-matched cohort of patients with extensive, liver-dominant chemotherapy refractory disease for whom there are limited treatment options,” said Prof. Jens Ricke, director of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine at the University Hospital of Magdeburg, Germany, and senior author of the study. “The evidence suggests that radioembolization should be considered as a treatment option for patients with liver-only or liver-dominant colorectal metastases who have failed or are intolerant of chemotherapy.”
 
About the study
The study compared the overall survival of 58 patients with colorectal cancer metastases that were either limited to or predominately affected the liver, who were refractory to all recommended chemotherapy or had refused further chemotherapy, and were unsuitable for other treatment options such as surgical resection, local ablation or other forms of radiotherapy. Twenty-nine patients received radioembolization using SIR-Spheres (90Y-labeled resin microspheres; Sirtex Medical Limited, Sydney, Australia) and were followed prospectively. These patients were matched retrospectively for prior treatments and tumour burden with a contemporary cohort of >500 patients who received BSC from 3 centres in Germany to identify 29 consecutive patients with at least 2 of 4 specific matching criteria (the presence of synchronous or metachronous metastases, tumour burden, increased alkaline phosphatase, and/or carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] >200 U/mL). The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival.
 
Following radioembolization, 12 patients (41.4%) had a partial response and a further 5 (17.2%) had stable disease, giving a disease control rate of 58.6%. The progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the radioembolization cohort compared to 2.1 months in those receiving BSC. The adverse events following radioembolization were generally mild-to-moderate in nature, predominately transient, self-limiting and manageable.
 
“The results of this study are consistent with those from similar cohorts of chemotherapy-refractory patients with colorectal liver metastases treated using radioembolization,” said Dr. Ricarda Seidensticker, consultant interventional radiologist and lead author of the study. “This was the first comparative study of radioembolization to use overall survival as the primary endpoint, in an ethical design that avoided the crossover of patients to active therapy, which usually blunts the ability of trials to show a difference in survival. These results also compare favorably with recent studies using new biological agents to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. In one randomized controlled trial of cetuximab, for example, the median overall survival was 6.1 months versus 4.6 months with best supportive care. In a similar trial with panitumumab, median overall survival was 6.4 months versus similar survival with best supportive care followed by crossover to panitumumab at progression.”
 
Large international randomized controlled trials are currently evaluating the effectiveness of radioembolization using SIR-Spheres combined with first-line chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases compared to chemotherapy alone in order to assess whether this treatment should be used as an early intervention.