Ms Rachel A. G. Reyes’ contention in her article (MT, Dec. 16) that the Paris Agreement is “legally binding” is wrong. It is not.
One reason the negotiators had to work overtime was the discovery on the last day that a “shall” instead of a “should” had crept into the draft of the final document.
Already have an active account? Log in here.
Continue reading with one of these options:
Continue reading with one of these options:
Premium + Digital Edition
Ad-free access
P 80 per month
(billed annually at P 960)
- Unlimited ad-free access to website articles
- Limited offer: Subscribe today and get digital edition access for free (accessible with up to 3 devices)
TRY FREE FOR 14 DAYS
See details
See details
If you have an active account, log in
here
.