• Liberal-communist alliance shows absurdity of human-rights reparations law



    First read
    MARKING yesterday the 119th anniversary of national independence, I cautiously hoped that the entire republic—all 7,100 islands of the archipelago, all 104 million of our people, and all the nation’s politicians—would come together to celebrate the birth of the nation on June 12, 1898.

    I fantasized that the AFP would deliver on its vow to liberate Marawi City by Independence Day. But on TV Sunday night, as I was writing this, the AFP spokesman announced that the military was still uncertain whether it could end the crisis on June 12.

    Some friends caution that the public should not count too much on an early or happy ending, because the leaders of the Liberal Party and the leaders of the communist insurgency have banded together to push their own agenda. They are working feverishly to establish their own republic to rule the Philippine islands.

    Liberal-communist tie-up
    The alliance seeks to derail the implementation of martial law in Mindanao by the AFP. They are joined together in a petition before the Supreme Court seeking 1) an order to Congress to meet in joint session to deliberate on the martial law proclamation; and 2) a judicial ruling that Proclamation 216 is unconstitutional.

    Many citizens wonder whether these Duterte opponents have taken the side of the Maute rebels against the government. When senators worry anxiously about the plight of Maute combatants, instead of the killing of government troops and civilians, they are sending a dangerous message. When Sen. Risa Hontiveros declares that the Maute uprising should not require the response of martial law, she is both naïve and foolish.

    The Liberals will latch on to anyone and anything these days that can help them in their objective of taking down President Duterte.

    Bizarre Liberal legislation    
    This is not the first time that the Liberals and martial-law activists have made common cause in our public life.

    In 2013, during the time of President Benigno S. Aquino 3rd and the 15th Congress, the Liberals and communists joined together to force the passage of a bizarre piece of legislation: the Human Rights Victims Reparations and Recognition Act. It was signed into law by President Aquino on February 25, 2013.

    The reparations act provides compensation to victims of human rights violations during the time when the entire country was under martial law. The law is designed, according to Aquino, to “recognize the suffering of many under martial law.”

    The law established the Human Rights Violations Victims’ Memorial Commission and authorizes P10 billion (about $245 million) in payments to the victims. The term of the commission will end in May 2018, unless the law is extended by an act of Congress. Letting the law lapse is easier than repealing it.

    By what kind of legal reasoning did President Aquino and the Liberals come up with this absurd law to compensate individuals who sought to overthrow the constitutional government of President Marcos?

    First, by the logic of “victors’ justice” and as a by product of the Aquinos’ program of demonizing Marcos.

    Second, by the same lack of scruples that emboldened Aquino to invent the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), defraud the nation of P155 billion of public funds, and impeach a sitting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

    The reparations law benefits only the communist rebels. The law is as bizarre as the creation of the Bantayog ng Mga Bayani (Martyrs’ Memorial) on 1.5 hectares of government land in Quezon City—ostensibly to memorialize the heroes of Edsa and during the Marcos dictatorship.

    Obama’s drone war
    To understand the absurdity of the reparations act, I draw attention to the debate that took place in America, when President Barack Obama inaugurated his “drone war”, which identified individuals for targeted killings, including American citizens who chose to join the terrorists in the Middle East.

    The drone war was not officially announced; Obama did not acknowledge it until 2013. An anonymous whistleblower leaked documents about the US use of drones in Somalia, Libya and Afghanistan from 2011 to 2013.

    In a 2014 court filing, the government admitted that 469,000 people had been nominated in 2013 for inclusion in a government database of “known or suspected terrorists.” Only 4,900 were rejected. Presumption of innocence it is not. Although Osama bin Laden’s name was in a terrorist database long before he was killed, so too was the name Abdulrahman al-Awlaki — innocent, 16 years old, an American citizen and killed by a US drone strike.

    There ensued a noisy public debate on the morality of the drone war. Many excoriated Obama for the killings. Some defended Obama’s policy.

    Charles Krauthammer, the Pulitzer prize-winning Washington Post columnist, came out in support of Obama’s policy.

    Krauthammer wrote on February 14, 2013:

    “Al-Awlaki was no ordinary enemy. He was a US citizen. By what right does the President order the killing by drone of an American? Where’s the due process?

    “Answer: Once you take up arms against the United States, you become an enemy combatant, thereby forfeiting the privileges of citizenship and the protection of the Constitution, including due process. You retain only the protection of the laws of war – no more and no less than those of your foreign comrades-in- arms. (Indeed, David French of the American Center for Law and Justice, suggests stripping such traitors of citizenship, thereby formalizing their extra-constitutional status.)”

    Krauthammer’s argument for the killing of Americans fighting against their country may be similarly invoked against the Philippine payment of reparations to Filipinos who fought against our government.

    Tough-minded vs tender-minded
    Krauthammer was writing of America’s war against terror. He strongly advocates tough-minded government policy toward rebellion.

    With Filipino leaders, except for President Marcos, the primary tendency has been one of tender-mindedness. The general policy since 1986 has been to apply due process to rebellion and, when possible, leniency. The hope is always to negotiate peace even up to exhaustion.

    Much of this, we can understand and probably defend. But reparations for the rebel or insurgent who falls victim to government forces? Few Filipinos can comprehend this Aquino invention.

    Many are asking: How about the soldiers and police who fight for our people and our country.

    Our men in uniform also need protection and support, and the reciprocal loyalty of the people.

    Marawi battle in decisive phase
    The issue has come to the fore because government troops are facing a supreme test of wills with the Maute rebels, who are supported by IS and scores of foreign fighters who came to the country to fight beside them.

    The killing of 13 Marines while they were trying to secure villages in Marawi highlights the challenge to the AFP. The news that the remaining Maute rebels, and their foreign supporters, along with Isnilon Hapilon, have holed up in one Marawi village suggests that the battle for Marawi has entered its climacteric or decisive phase.

    I’m now monitoring developments as though it were a ballgame —with the stakes infinitely higher.

    The nation holds its breath in anticipation of the final outcome of the battle.



    Please follow our commenting guidelines.


    1. Mr. Makabenta, that’s the beauty of having an idiots and traitors in your own backyard. As the film Heneral Luna say’s “kung meron tayong ganitong klaseng mga kasamahan di na natin kailangan pa ng kalaban”

    2. So we should remove Bonifacio, Rizal, Luna, DelPilar et al from our history books, Yen?? They are rebels afterall, right???

      • our ancestor revolutionaries rebelled for our right of self determination and self gov’t, they rebelled against aliens who govern and exploits them during those days thus don’t compare it to what those communist are fighting for.

      • Hey Chris. History is our greatest teacher. Are you saying that China is better off without Mao??

    3. The legislators responsible for the passing of that law giving compensation to rebels I presume include the current members of congress affiliated with the Liberal Party. These traitors should be unmasked for our countrymen to know who among their representatives and senators look after the welfare of the communists instead of them.

    4. Of course Police or military scalawag abuses is a different story. But here is a webbed story of kidnap for ransom bandits grown terrorists striking at will and then simply integrating into society. They have grown that big and powerful now to even take over an entire city like Marawi. When supporters or active armed members are caught they simply cry fowl and eachtime fool the government. It is only under martial law that the police or military can establish the necessary dragnets to catch those terrorists or rebels.

    5. Its quite a difficult situation to debate & to legislate. Take for instance a civil war. Both the uk & usa have fought a civil war. When does it become a civil war & not a terrorist uprising. Syria started off with a civil war, i have no idea what you call it now but assad im sure all or most of us agree is not the right man to run syria now. Their country is ruined. Right now i can see many countries heading towards civil war & the uk is one of them. It wont happen for quite a while yet but its because of the muslim population & their desire to have both political power & sharia law. I am against religion & since its first inception ( or whatever word you wish to use ) there have always been wars over religion. The islamic religion takes away many freedoms, especially for women & our liberal social justice warrior women seem to not understand that defending muslims over verbal attacks on their religious doctrine to our relaxed way of living by many of us will lead to their subjugation. One day they will see their folly & every non muslim country that allows them in will end up with big problems with them. You are also having them right now.

    6. Before, they were “tens of thousands of victims of Marcos, as they were cheerfully labeled by Marcos’ old foes, conjuring the image of innocent victims picked at random for no purpose other than to satisfy Marcos’ barbaric blood lust. At least now, after Human Rights Victims Reparations and Recognition Act, we know who these “victims” are. SELDA, Joma Sison and company and the Yellows who supported their rebellion.

    7. Manuel Jaime on

      Only in the Philippines!!! That is what i can say and tell of what seems to be happening when government succumbs to the whims of traitors and rebels trying to overthrow our legitimate regimes. Since 1986,these so called leftist nationalists who are actually traitors and communist ideologues and symphathizers,pillaged,looted and robbed our nations coffers and destroyed the soul of this country thanks to the help of the 4 Presidents (Erap is not included) before Duterte. Time to end it,,,and PDigong must ensure that their having been spoiled for the last 30 years must be put into a stop…Release Gen.Palparan and let the infamous military officer and tactician deal with them…

    8. I don’t find in Spain so patriot journalists as him, thanks it’s so refreshing and long live the law and order, long live Duterte.

    9. “Many are asking: How about the soldiers and police who fight for our people and our country.”

      Look what happened to Gen. Jovito Palaparan. He defended the Philippine government and the Filipinos and fought the CPP-NPA terrorists, but he is now in prison. How can you expect the soldiers fight vigorously the enemies of the state, if later they will be charged of human rights violations by the communists and go into prison, just like what happened to Gen. Palaparan.

      Fil-Am activist Melissa Roxas was kidnapped by her comrade NPA rebels who wore camouflage. She was brought inside an alleged military camp and tortured, but her captors freed her later. But when Melissa and members of The Commission on Human Rights visited a military camp, she could not recognize any of the structures inside the camp.

      The communist rebels are free but Gen. Palaparan is now in prison.