• Milestone visit to China led by PH ambassador

    1

    list20160922This refers to the news story with the title “’Track 2’ diplomacy with China begins” that was reported by Mr. Michael Joe T. Delizo and featured on the frontpage of The Manila Times on September 20, 2016.

    The report on the milestone visit of our Philippine Council for Foreign Relations (PCFR) group in Beijing on September 13-16 failed to give due mention and recognition to the Chairman and President of the PCFR, Ambassador Jose V. Romero Jr., who led our delegation in a Track II initiative with Chinese counterparts. The conspicuous omission of the name of the PCFR president as the head of the delegation needs to be addressed and rectified to give credit to whom this is due. Significantly, this will not only boost the morale of our team but also make The Manila Times report accurate.

    Please find attached herewith the complete list of the members of the delegation of the PCFR that endeavored the Track II diplomatic initiative with its Chinese counterparts in Beijing. It was Ambassador Romero that was sent the letter of invitation to go to Beijing, along with his delegation, by Ambassador Wu Hailong, president of the Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs. It was also Ambassador Romero, along with Gen. Adan–co-chairman of the National Security Committee of the PCFR–that sent the letter to the Secretary of National Defense, requesting me to join the Filipino delegation in Beijing.

    In view of the foregoing, it is with hope that the necessary correction and/or clarification be made in the news report for clarity and fairness.

    Thank you very much for your kind understanding.

    Very truly yours,
    Ananda Devi Domingo-Almase, DPA
    Professor III
    National Defense College of the Philippines
    Camp Emilio Aguinaldo, Quezon City

    Share.
    loading...

    1 Comment

    1. Mariano Patalinjug on

      Yonkers, New York
      22 September 2016

      What the writer,Professor Amanda Devi Domingo-Almase, DPA obviously fails to mention here is WHAT THE PURPOSE OF THE DELEGATION’S VISIT TO CHINA WAS. Logically, the next issue is WHAT DID IT ACCOMPLISH in terms of the purpose?

      These ought to be the more substantive issuea she should have elucidated clearly and fully. The full list of the members of the Delegation she should have assigned a secondary importance.

      MARIANO PATALINJUG
      patalinjugmar@gmail.com

    Leave A Reply