The Manila Times

Life & Times

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

 

PEOPLE
By Bob Garon
Issues and non-issues


IT all began with a simple enough argument about being late. Soon, however, after a sharp exchange of some hard words, things got more complicated. Now, the issue about tardiness was put on hold as the couple started to fight about him being insensitive to her feelings. He, in turn, lashed back to her and accused her of being too demanding and acting like a prima donna. Before they called a truce, her mother-in-law had become another issue.

What should have been a minor misunderstanding not deserving anything more than perhaps a side comment had become a major skirmish. It happened because of what I called the “layering” of issues. Layering occurs when other issues, besides the initial one that triggered the argument are thrown into the discussion, thus triggering an escalation in the conflict. What started out as an exchange of rifle fire now becomes a major battle with artillery and combat aircraft called in by both sides.

When there is layering of issues, the initial argument happens because the major issues between both sides are simmering just beneath the surface of the relationship and, like a restless volcano, are just waiting to explode.

The situation becomes very much more complicated when layering takes place. The combatants cannot focus on one issue and resolve it because each side brings in its own agenda. Both sides want to discuss areas where they feel they are at the greatest advantage and attempt to divert attention away from issues where they feel weakest.

In order to better solve the problems, couples who need to iron out their differences have to do all in their power to avoid layering issues. This can be done by laying down two simple ground rules. First, agree to stick to the issue at hand. Courts do this to avoid heated arguments. Lawyers are admonished to strictly hold to the rules lest they be called to order. Next, nobody should raise his or her voice. Once it does happen, a recess will automatically be called until the parties can resume with calmer disposition.

I write about this because my family had agreed to discuss issues over dinner once a week using precisely the above rules and it has worked wonderfully for us. Every member of the family can bring up any issue, but nobody is allowed to inject other issues into the discussion. Because everybody can take as much time as is needed to fully talk out an issue without worrying about getting sidetracked or shouted at, the “family dinner” is amazingly calm, even when some difficult and controversial matters are brought to the table.

One more thing. Because the family dinner has worked so well, every member is encouraged to wait for that time to discuss thorny issues. Not surprisingly, the waiting time acts as a cooling off period and allows for a less emotional discussion during the family dinner.

I urge you to try the family dinner or some other tool to better settle problems. Keeping to one issue at the time will go to a long way in achieving that.


If you have problems about drugs, alcohol and behavior/attitude call my office at 820-6107 or 825-1771 or e-mail me at gvcbuenca@vasia.com or write me at P.O. Box 2099 MCPO, Makati City.

   
 

manilagift

Manila Times Friends

Try Yahoo Travel for Cheap Airline Tickets

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: