The Manila Times

Sports

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

 

Gun lobbyists want even 
less controls after shooting

 
The powerful US gun lobby, far from being weakened by last week’s campus shooting, actually has emerged stronger, gun advocates said, stepping up their calls for a better-armed US citizenry to prevent future attacks.

Gun rights advocates said that following the massacre, in which 23-year-old Cho Seung-Hui fatally shot 32 victims at Virginia Tech University, gun control forces will be hard pressed to make the case for tighter restrictions.

“This is a huge nail in the coffin of gun control,” said Philip Van Cleave, president of the gun rights group Virginia Citizens Defense League.

“They had gun control on campus and it got all those people killed, because nobody could defend themselves,” he told AFP.

Van Cleave said the tragedy could give a boost to a years-long effort in Virginia to pass legislation allowing students to carry weapons on campus— especially since existing laws failed to prevent Cho’s murderous rampage.

“Gun control failed. That student, under university rules, was not to have a gun,” Van Cleave said.

“Come legislative season, which is in January, we’re going to be fighting to get a bill put in . . . that would let students that are over 21 with a permit . . . carry concealed self-defense,” he said.

The legislation, which would also allow any faculty member possessing a concealed carry permit to carry a concealed weapon, has a “greatly enhanced” chance of passage following the Virginia Tech shooting, Van Cleave said.

Former House of Representative Speaker Newt Gingrich, on US television Sunday, also called for making guns more accessible.

“There have been incidents of this kind of a killer who were stopped, because in fact, people who are law-abiding people, who are rational and people who are responsible had the ability to stop them,” he told ABC television’s “This Week” program.

The southern state of Virginia, where the shootings occurred, allows anyone 21 years of age or older and holding a concealed handgun permit to carry a weapon. That is not true, however of college campuses, most of which have a strict prohibition against carrying guns—much to the chagrin of the state’s pro-gun activists.

Other gun rights advocates echo Van Cleave’s view that had even one Virginia Tech student or faculty member been armed, last week’s carnage might have been prevented.

“The only person who is responsible to defend you is you—the police are incapable of defending each and every one of us all the time,” said Mike Stollenwerk, 44, cofounder of OpenCarry.org, a Virginia-based gun-rights networking group.

“Citizens have an inherent right to be able to defend themselves,” he said, speaking last week to The Washington Times newspaper.

Many observers had expected that the Virginia Tech rampage would be a rallying cry for gun control activists, but that has not turned out to be the case.

Even the mass killings at Colorado’s Columbine High School in 1999 failed to result in gun-control legislation, despite the emotional outcry over those shootings. The reaction has been even more muted following last week’s tragedy—the deadliest school shooting in US history.

US politicians have shown little inclination to introduce new gun control legislation in a country where an estimated 40 percent of US households own a gun and where for many the constitutional right to bear arms is seen as sacred.

Reports that Cho’s past brush with mental health authorities should have prevented him from being able to purchase a firearm is prompting a legislative reaction, however.

US Sen. Chuck Schumer and Representative Carolyn Mc­Carthy on Sunday announced plans to introduce federal bill requiring states to send critical mental health information to the federal government, which would allow officials to screen out those who don’t qualify to own firearms.

US media reported Sunday that a similar proposed bill in California would impose mandatory background checks for buyers of handgun ammunition, require a face-to-face purchase instead of by mail, and require gun shops to store ammunition behind counters.

And in Washington, at a Christian memorial service at the National Cathedral, Reverend Howard Anderson called for “the courage to say ‘no’ to those who would allow guns to be sold so readily to those who might kill with them.”
--AFP

   
 

Ahonpinoy

Manila Times Friends

Cheap Airline Tickets

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: