The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

 

INSIDE CONGRESS
By Efren L. Danao
Filipino and the Babel of languages

 
Now that Rep. Eduardo Nonato Joson of Nueva Ecija is back, I expect him to deliver a privileged speech in Filipino during the celebration of Linggo ng Wika. Edno has been pushing for the greater use of Filipino as the national language and he has been punctuating this by conducting press briefings and interpellations and by delivering privileged speeches in Filipino.

On several occasions, in the Eighth and Ninth Congresses, Edno’s proclivity in using Filipino got the goat of many Cebuanos, notably the late Rep. James Chiongbian of South Cotabato and Rep. Pablo Garcia of Cebu. James or Pabling would stand up and raise a point of order once Edno started speaking in Filipino. They said they could not understand what Edno was saying since they had very little knowledge of Filipino. The presiding officer invariably sided with Edno on the propriety of using Filipino in a privileged speech. James or Pabling would then interpellate Edno using Ce­buano. That’s when another point of order is raised, with some congressmen asking if they could also speak in their own language.

Incidentally, James later authored a law that turned his district into a new province called Saranggani. He was stern-faced but with a loud guffaw. Despite his displeasure of privileged speeches delivered in Filipino, James often spoke with me in broken Filipino but with a thick Visayan accent. Once his ire was roused, it was almost impossible to mollify him. I remember one time when he was virtually raising hell on the floor over something I had already forgotten. Rep. Mike Mastura of Maguindanao pleaded with him to pipe down, saying, “Manong James, you have counseled me a number of times. It is about time that you also listen to me.” James retorted: “Yes, that’s true, but you never listened to my advice!” Mike was completely silenced by that riposte and he beat a hasty retreat as James went on with his rage.

Of course, Mike himself was not beyond getting angry. Once, Rep. Rodrigo Gutang of North Cotabato introduced a bill that pertained to the affairs of Maguindanao. Mike had to be restrained from going after Gutang, who had retired from the Army as major general. Mike, speaking on a question of personal privilege, said that his impulse was to take an Armalite and empty it on Gutang. Gutang later withdrew his measure and apologized to Mike. Mike later moved for the deletion of his unparliamentary remarks.

Accents and the great divide

But I am deviating from my original topic. I mentioned the case of Edno merely to amplify the fact that decades after the passage of a law mandating a national language, many still could not agree on what our national language is.

I am aware that some persons prefer to speak in English than in Filipino because of their difficulty in pronouncing Filipino words correctly. Some, however, suffer the same difficulty even when speaking in English.

I once met somebody who insisted on talking in English. When I asked him what was his line of work, he replied proudly: “I am a bicker.”

I never heard of a “bicker” before so his reply drew my curiosity.

“What is a bicker?” I asked him.

He looked at me, as if I had asked a stupid question, then replied: “Why, a bicker is one who bicks kicks!”

A friend said this happened when he once went to a hotel in the provinces. A young sweet girl at the hotel counter asked him: “Chick-in ho kayo?” My friend was taken aback momentarily but recovered his bearings and replied: “De-hins. Noy-pi.”

Tong on ZTE

One of my favorite former congressmen, Tong Payumo of Bataan, sent an email detailing his objection to the $329-million ZTE contract to build a national broadband network. The Department of Transportation and Communications justified the NBN contract with ZTE, saying that the government would save money by putting up a backbone for its communications system. Tong slammed this line of reasoning.

 Tong said that the government would be abandoning its policy pronouncement that “it is the business of government to stay out of business” if it pushes through with the ZTE contract. He maintained that government should undertake only those initiatives which exceed the capacity of private individuals or groups acting independently.

“Government ownership of business, especially in the Philippines, does not mean public ownership of the business. It only amounts to control by politicians and bureaucrats,” Tong observed.


efrendanao2003@yahoo.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends


Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: