The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Thursday, February, 8 2007

 

ENTHUSIASMS & FOREBODINGS
By Rene Q. Bas
Ironic twist in KMT-CCP politics


The top leadership of the People’s Republic of China on the mainland, still ruled firmly by the Communist Party, is incessantly irritated by the pro-independence stand of the present administration running the “Republic of China” on Taiwan. Ironically, China’s leaders are nowadays more pleased and at home with their former archenemy, the Kuomintang (KMT).

That’s because the Kuo­mintang has always held, and doesn’t look like it will ever abandon, the principle that there is only one China. There may be a fight between communists and noncommunist Chinese over which is better for China, but they are all Chinese. To both the CCP and the KMT the Chinese of China include all the Han Chinese as well as the Taiwanese on Taiwan and the surrounding islands.

In a visit to mainland China in April 2005, the former chairman and a still respected figure of the KMT, Lien Chan, reiterated his party’s “One China Policy.” Immediately after, James Soong, the chairman of KMT’s ally, the People First Party (PFP), also visited China and affirmed his party’s belief that “there is only one China which happens to be controlled by two governments [one in Beijing and the other in Taipeh] and that Taiwan is an integral part of China.” Taiwan’s KMT, PFP and the New Party are coalesced pro-unification parties.

Unfortunately, since 2000 the KMT and its pro-unification allies have been reduced to playing the opposition role in Taiwan politics. The democratically elected ruling party, since 2000, has been the native-Taiwanese-based party of President Chen Shui-bian, the Democratic Progressive Party.

The DPP was formed illegally in 1986, when Taiwan was still under martial law. It was the first opposition party in Taiwan to challenge the KMT.

The trouncing of the KMT by Chen’s Democratic Progressive Party came as a result of the process of liberalization and democratization started by President Chiang Ching-kuo, the late President Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek’s son. KMT’s defeat was also the result of the dislike the Taiwanese have always had for the Han-Chinese from the mainland.

The “Republic of China” gradually became really democratic during the 1990s. In the 80s, the ROC and the KMT, under President Chiang Ching-kuo, started democratic reforms and liberalization. Chiang allowed the Taiwanese to share power. He made native Taiwanese Lee Ting Hui, a technocrat, his vice-president.

In 1987, a year before his death while still president of the ROC, Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law. He had been gradually relaxing government control over Taiwan society. He granted his people the freedom of speech and of the press.

When Chiang Ching-kuo died Vice-President Lee Teng-hui succeeded him. He continued the democratization process and gave more administrative authority to native Taiwanese. This was called “localization.” Hardline KMT politicians bitterly criticized it. Localization was not just about government power. It was also about giving pride of place to Taiwanese culture over that of national Chinese culture. Schools focused less and less on China and more and more on Taiwan as if it were a nation and a state.

This led to the division of the people between the pro-unification and pro-independence. But not only ethnic Taiwanese follow the pro-independence line, many children of mainlanders also think the best thing for the people of their wealthy and self-reliant island and the surrounding islands is to be on their own—dealing with China as a separate country.

President Chen Shui-bian’s pro-independence government has changed the name of the Chiang Kai-shek International Airport. The late President and Generalissimo’s name is replaced with the name of the place, Taoyuan.

One of Taipeh’s landmarks, the Chiang Kaishek Memorial Hall, will also be given a new name, if some PDP leaders will have their way.

All of this is to make more residents of Taiwan feel less connected to the China of the Nationalists (Kuomintang), of the Communists and of history books and of legends.

Now the Chen Shui-bian government is removing statues of Chiang Kai-shek from military establishments.

They do not need to remove statues of Dr. Sun Yat Sen, the father of modern China and founder of the KMT. There aren’t many, anyway.

The greatest irony would be if mainland China becomes the only place where Chiang Kai-shek statues—well cared for and accorded proper respect—can be found.

   
 

Phgifts

gifts2pinas

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Try Yahoo Travel for Cheap Airline Tickets


Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: