The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Saturday, July, 21 2007

 

NATURE FOR LIFE
By Anabelle E. Plantilla
The precautionary principle and GMOs


According to the ISIS Report (www.isis.org.uk/sapp.php), the issue of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is an area that cries out for application of the precautionary principle, if only because so much damage can still be prevented at this stage. The most commonly raised objection to the introduction of genetically modified crops is ecological, that the genes may spread to other species. That is indeed a danger; more than that, it has already happened. In Canada and the United States the genes that make oil seed rape tolerant to herbicides have spread to crops and weeds, which end up tolerant to multiple herbicides. That makes the herbicides useless and the weeds harder to control than before.

But while the ecological problems are real, and have attracted the most attention, they are by no means the whole story. The technology itself is a cause for concern. To be sure, hardly anyone is likely to die immediately after eating GM food. Apart from acute toxins and allergens, any harmful effects are likely to appear only in the longer term. There is evidence that many of the Bt toxins engineered into GM crops as biopesticides are actual or potential allergens for human beings, and toxic to a wide range of beneficial species. But it will be very hard to identify these and other effects by epidemiological studies because there is no control group.

There is evidence strongly suggesting that GMOs are hazardous. First, transgenic DNA is not, as is so often claimed, “just the same as natural breeding.” It is different. For example, when researchers created mutants for herbicide tolerance both by genetic engineering and by conventional mutagenesis, they found that the transgenes were up to 30 times more likely to spread to wild-type plants. The more rapid spreading of transgenes is a potential hazard in itself, but what is crucial here is the demonstration that the transgene was different. Genetic engineering is not merely reproducing what happens in nature, and it is creating new combinations of genes that have never existed.

Transgenic DNA can also be transferred (horizontally) to unrelated species, to bacteria in the soil or in the gut and to cells of all animals including humans. When mice were fed viral or transgenic DNA, not only was the DNA not completely degraded in the gut (as we used to be assured it would be), it passed through the wall of the intestine into the blood stream and even became incorporated in the genome of some mouse cells. When fed to pregnant mice, the foreign DNA was found in some cells of the fetuses and newborn, showing it had gone through the placenta.

The researchers raised concerns over the possibility that transgenic DNA integrated into human cells could result in mutations and trigger cancer. This prediction has sadly become reality in the first cancer cases identified among the handful of “successes” in gene therapy at the end of 2002. These patients were exposed to transgenic DNA similar in construction to those in GM foods.

The technology by which many GMOs are made is inherently dangerous, also because it often involves the creation, directly or indirectly, of super-viruses, which, unlike most natural viruses, are capable of crossing species barriers.

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends


Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: