The Manila Times

Metro

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Thursday, March 22, 2007

 

Defense officials steer clear 
of Ligot plea-bargain offer

By Anthony Vargas, Reporter

DEFENSE and military officials on Wednesday steered clear of the controversy involving a retired army general who is offering P20 million from the wealth he allegedly amassed in exchange for the dropping of charges against him.

In a plea-bargain offer, former military comptroller Jacinto Ligot wants to surrender part of his assets if the charges against him and his family are withdrawn.

Ligot, who retired as a lieutenant general, is facing graft charges before the Sandiganbayan for not listing P139 million in his statement of assets and liabilities and net worth (SALN).

Defense Secretary Hermo-genes Ebdane Jr., Ligot’s classmate at the Philippine Military Academy, said the move could be a legal maneuver of Ligot’s lawyer.

“I’m not in a position to say whether it is acceptable or not,” Ebdane told reporters.

The Armed Forces Public Information chief, Lt. Colonel Bartolome Bacarro, refused comment, saying the military no longer has a hold on the retired general.

After Ligot retired in August 2004, news of his alleged ill-gotten wealth quickly spread and put the military under heavy criticism.

Newsbreak Magazine reported that Ligot owns two houses in California worth $700,000, and a condominium unit in Fort Bonifacio worth P22 million, among other properties.

Ligot allegedly acquired the properties while he was still in the military but did not include in his SALN.

The Office of the Ombudsman charged Ligot before the Sandiganbayan in 2005.

Retired major general Carlos F. Garcia, who is also facing a P300-million graft case before the Sandiganbayan, succeeded Ligot as comptroller.

In December 2005 a military tribunal sentenced Garcia to two years hard labor and dishonorably dismissed him.

Legal experts in the House of Representatives on Wednesday are worried that the plea bargain offers of Ligot and Charlie “Atong” Ang could set a precedent.

While a plea bargain facilitates a trial and the forfeiture of illegally amassed wealth, such hastily rendered decisions may defeat the purpose of punitive sanctions against those accused of graft, Representatives Salacnib Baterina of Ilocos Sur and Marcelino Libanan of Eastern Samar said.

Citizen’s Battle against Corruption Rep. Joel Villanueva also believes that the cases of Atong Ang and Ligot “encourage corruption at a grand scale.”

“It appears they’re are sending a bad message that you can steal from the government as long as you make sure its big enough to be able to strike a deal with government and still leave some for you,” Villanueva said.

The plea bargain, according to Baterina, is a legitimate legal maneuver and acceptable under any justice system. But he said it should not be taken as an easy way out by grafters.

“The courts must exercise extra caution in rendering a decision on plea bargain offered by any accused. They should give weight to the gravity of the offense committed by the accused,” Baterina said.

Libanan shared a similar view, as he cautioned the plea bargain remedy if abused, would possibly allow grafters walk free and do the crime all over again, and therefore could send wrong signals to others.
--With Maricel V. Cruz

   
 

Ahonpinoy

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

gifts2pinas

philflora.gif

Try Yahoo Travel for Cheap Airline Tickets

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: