The Manila Times

Metro

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

 

Govt lawyers defend NBN-ZTE

By Jomar Canlas, Reporter

GOVERNMENT lawyers countered the petition lodged by Iloilo Vice-Governor Rolex Suplico and Amsterdam Holdings Inc. (AHI) questioning the controversial National Broad­band Network (NBN) contract between the government and ZTE Corporation of China.

In a 111-page comment prepared by the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), led by Acting Justice Secretary Agnes Devanadera, the government lawyers prayed before the Supreme Court that the contract be pursued for the good of the people and the economy.

“The NBN Project is an endeavor whose time has come. A paperless bureaucracy, one that is more transparent to the public it serves, one that is more accountable to the people it bridges together, one that is totally responsive to the rapidly changing millennium,” the comment says.

The lawyers pointed out that they made a thorough evaluation of the NBN project. They found out that “ZTE’s tender came out superior, not just in capacity and technology, but even in what the government would have to shell out in the long run for this national broadband endeavor.”

“The national broadband network project to be undertaken by ZTE Corporation and funded by the government of the People’s Republic of China through the China Export-Import Bank is a valid executive agreement not co­vered by the Government Procure­ment Reform Act and the Build-Operate-Transfer Law,” it says.

The OSG stressed that Suplico himself admitted that the Commission on Audit has the constitutional mandate to determine whether the contract is excessive and unconscionable. Hence, his statement that the $329-million investment is excessive and unnecessary “preempts the COA’s function rendering his petition, not only premature, but without basis.”

The government lawyers argued that the petitioners have no legal standing to file the suit as no government funds were spent in the said project and the petitioners will not suffer a direct injury if the contract will be implemented. Even AHI cannot show proof that it has a claim standing as a taxpayer.

   
 

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

OFW Gifts

philflora.gif

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: