The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Motoring

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

 

FROM THE NEWSROOM
By Johnna Villaviray-Giolagon
Stinky explosion


Explosives experts believe that the ignition of methane gas trapped in the basement of an upscale mall may have caused the explosion that killed 11 people and brought down a wing of the shopping complex at the heart of Ma­kati’s business district.

A computer-generated image presented by police showed that a 3500-liter diesel tank at the basement of Glorietta 2 was punctured around the midsection, a type of damage consistent with that of a gas explosion.

Police Senior Supt. Luiso Ticman, who oversees the investigation, says they have not ruled out the possibility that the blast was caused by a bomb and they have not recovered any evidence that would suggest that it was.

But metallurgical and petrochemical experts have been called in anyway to see if they would agree with police initial conclusions the explosion was caused by methane, an odorless yet volatile gas.

Explosives expert Pennimore Jauican said the physical attributes of the site of the explosion suggest that it was caused by gas. He notes that the metal tank used as a diesel bunker was blown open from inside out, suggesting that the blast originated from inside.

Jauican and his team even went inside the bunker, which still contains about a foot high of diesel. He says that what they saw inside made them suspect even more that it was a gas explosion.

Investigations on the explosion Friday that injured over 100 shoppers indicate that it originated from the basement of Glorietta 2 mall. The floor plan of the building showed that the basement contained a large rectangular diesel tank, generator set and a septic tank.

Post-blast investigations showed that the sides of the diesel tank were bent to a concave shape while the cement walls were pushed out to a 45-degree angle.

Jauican says that had the explosion been caused by a high explosive then the tank would have sustained more damage and the cement walls of the basement pulverized.

A week previously, liquids from the septic tank seeped into the basement, which a tenant is leasing. This was what construction workers were busy on days prior to the blast. Management tried to remedy this by placing a portable, submersible pump intended to drain water from the area. Another explosives expert, whose team was the first to enter the seat of the explosion, says that they have not fully cleared the basement of flooding and the water is mixing with human waste, probably from the septic tank.

Jauican and his team are looking into the theory that a sparks from a short-circuit in the pump might have ignited the methane gas that has collected in the area, and seeped into the diesel tank. Methane gas is produced from the breakdown of the organic compounds in the overflow that had collected in the basement.

Another indication that the explosion did not originate from a bomb is because the bodies of the dead recovered from the scene were, thankfully, not mutilated.

An NBI expert, Romeo Contingio, says that there were no burns on the bodies of those killed in the tragedy. The bodies would have contained much more physical trauma if they were killed in a bomb blast.

The police prudence in determining the cause of the blast could be a result of initial findings from the crime laboratory showed the presence of the chemical RDX, a component of the plastic explosive C4, commonly used by the military.

Police chief Avelino Razon said their experts are now conducting tests to determine if the combustion or combination of methane and diesel and other chemicals and gases found in the basement could produce RDX.

The PNP’s carefulness and insistence on investigating the blast in an unemotional and scientific manner is laudable. The explosion was a tragedy whatever way you look at it. It serves no one any good if we jump right in into conclusions that we cannot prove.

Understandably, there are people who would be reluctant to believe that such a catastrophe was caused by an accident. I do not know what would be worse: if it was an attack or if it was an accident.

Eleven lives were lost. Over 100 others were injured. Hundreds others were disrupted. I am talking here about the employees of the shops that had to close down because of the blast.

You can fix a building. A business can survive if one branch closes. It’s more difficult to survive the trauma of a disaster. Even if it was caused by an accident.

   

The Manila Times National Essay-Writing Competition 2007

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: