The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

 

Rapporteur lauds govt’s initiatives


A United Nations official cited the Philippine government’s efforts to resolve political killings in the country, months after he criticized Manila’s alleged inaction on the issue.

Philip Alston, UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, noted that “a significant number of initiatives” to address the issue has been taken by the government since his visit in February, according to a statement on Monday.

Through Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita, Alston thanked the Philippine government for discussing with him the political killings, a key human-rights issue.

In a speech last week, Ermita told the UN General Assembly about the latest steps taken by the Arroyo administration on the issue.

Manila’s presence at the UN’s highest level is “important,” Alston said in a statement. “While clearly I will be very critical of issues that exist at present, the fact of [Manila’s] invitation and continued engagement does bring credit to the country.”

Alston delivered a general report on his mandate to the assembly on October 26 that covered his visit to the Philippines, the situations in other countries and the general importance of his role in human-rights protection.

The Philippines was one of the few countries that had him to look into extrajudicial killings. “Ninety percent of countries I have identified as warranting a country visit have failed to cooperate.”

Ermita was the first government representative given the opportunity to respond, out of 10 countries—China, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, the United States and Venezuela.

Highlighting the Philippines’ good citizenship in the international human rights system, Alston called on other countries to “engage as much as possible with the (UN Human Rights Council’s) special procedures, for the sake of our shared interest in human rights.”

The Philippines is a member of the council.

Ermita also underlined the measures the government has taken to address the killings, including Department of Justice instructions to expedite such cases—Administrative Order 18, which orders closer cooperation between investigators and prosecutors, and the new protective rule of court, the writ of amparo.

Alston said, “The bottom line is that only the elimination of such killings . . . will signal that the situation has turned the corner.”

Ermita agreed that Manila too wants to see results of its initiatives especially in the form of convictions.

His intervention was supported by Philippine Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Hilario Davide Jr., officers of the Philippine Mission in New York, and the executive director of the Presidential Human Rights Committee, which is headed by Ermita.

Ermita also met with the UN High Commissioner, Louise Arbour, the highest UN official on human rights.

Arbour told Alston that her meeting with the Philippine official was “very positive and constructive.”

During the dialogue with Alston at the General Assembly, nine other countries made comments, many of them refusing to recognize his mandate to visit, despite the fact that his office was directly created by the rights council.

Alston said about 30 countries have not issued invitations as requested, including some council members (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia) and Security Council members (China and Russia).

Indonesia and China said they have not invited the UN official because they have invited other rapporteurs this past year, while Kenya explained that recent general elections have not allowed it to invite Alston.

Singapore’s permanent representative objected to Alston’s stated wish to visit the country—the number of executions of convicts for crimes such as drug trafficking—saying these executions are carried out within the legal framework after a judicial decision and therefore are not within the special rapporteur’s mandate.

Arbour also commended the Philippines for being among the few to engage with the special rapporteur and “continuing to do so constructively.”

Rapporteur lauds govt’s initiatives

A United Nations official cited the Philippine government’s efforts to resolve political killings in the country, months after he criticized Manila’s alleged inaction on the issue.

Philip Alston, UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, noted that “a significant number of initiatives” to address the issue has been taken by the government since his visit in February, according to a statement on Monday.

Through Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita, Alston thanked the Philippine government for discussing with him the political killings, a key human-rights issue.

In a speech last week, Ermita told the UN General Assembly about the latest steps taken by the Arroyo administration on the issue.

Manila’s presence at the UN’s highest level is “important,” Alston said in a statement. “While clearly I will be very critical of issues that exist at present, the fact of [Manila’s] invitation and continued engagement does bring credit to the country.”

Alston delivered a general report on his mandate to the assembly on October 26 that covered his visit to the Philippines, the situations in other countries and the general importance of his role in human-rights protection.

The Philippines was one of the few countries that had him to look into extrajudicial killings. “Ninety percent of countries I have identified as warranting a country visit have failed to cooperate.”

Ermita was the first government representative given the opportunity to respond, out of 10 countries—China, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, the United States and Venezuela.

Highlighting the Philippines’ good citizenship in the international human rights system, Alston called on other countries to “engage as much as possible with the (UN Human Rights Council’s) special procedures, for the sake of our shared interest in human rights.”

The Philippines is a member of the council.

Ermita also underlined the measures the government has taken to address the killings, including Department of Justice instructions to expedite such cases—Administrative Order 18, which orders closer cooperation between investigators and prosecutors, and the new protective rule of court, the writ of amparo.

Alston said, “The bottom line is that only the elimination of such killings . . . will signal that the situation has turned the corner.”

Ermita agreed that Manila too wants to see results of its initiatives especially in the form of convictions.

His intervention was supported by Philippine Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Hilario Davide Jr., officers of the Philippine Mission in New York, and the executive director of the Presidential Human Rights Committee, which is headed by Ermita.

Ermita also met with the UN High Commissioner, Louise Arbour, the highest UN official on human rights.

Arbour told Alston that her meeting with the Philippine official was “very positive and constructive.”

During the dialogue with Alston at the General Assembly, nine other countries made comments, many of them refusing to recognize his mandate to visit, despite the fact that his office was directly created by the rights council.

Alston said about 30 countries have not issued invitations as requested, including some council members (Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia) and Security Council members (China and Russia).

Indonesia and China said they have not invited the UN official because they have invited other rapporteurs this past year, while Kenya explained that recent general elections have not allowed it to invite Alston.

Singapore’s permanent representative objected to Alston’s stated wish to visit the country—the number of executions of convicts for crimes such as drug trafficking—saying these executions are carried out within the legal framework after a judicial decision and therefore are not within the special rapporteur’s mandate.

Arbour also commended the Philippines for being among the few to engage with the special rapporteur and “continuing to do so constructively.”

   

The Manila Times National Essay-Writing Competition 2007

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: