The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

 

Special Report trash talk

Issue of medical-waste disposal 
at center of policy dilemma

By Sherryl Anne G. Quito Senior Reporter

Editor’s note: The earlier segments covered the advantages and problems with using incineration in the disposal of hazardous medical wastes. The previous parts also reported that government has not resorted to effective nonburn methods of disposal, because money is siphoned off to pay for loans used to acquire incinerators that were later made illegal under stricter environmental laws.

Last of three parts

With the ban on incinerators in the country, medical and other solid wastes are disposed via the conventional method—landfills. This is viewed as the most likely alternative to incineration. With the different methods of medical-waste disposal, landfill is the most common and probably accounts for more than 90 percent of the nation’s municipal refuse.

The Metro Manila Development Authority (MM­DA) said, “It is the most cost-effective method of disposal, with collection and  transportation accounting for 75 percent of the total cost.” A landfill’s lining and contouring compacts the uppermost cover layer, diverting drainage, and selecting proper soil in sites not subject to flooding or high groundwater levels.

A landfill is a site for the disposal of waste materials by burial and is the oldest form of waste treatment. Historically, landfills have been the most common methods of organized waste disposal and remain so in many places around the world. Landfills may include internal waste disposal sites as well as sites used by many producers. Many landfills are also used for other waste-management purposes, such as the temporary storage, consolidation and transfer, or processing of waste material (sorting, treatment or recycling). A landfill also may refer to ground that has been filled in with soil, instead of waste materials, so that it can be used for a specific purpose, such as for building houses. Unless such ground is stabilized, it may experience severe shaking or liquefaction in a large earthquake.

Special Report trash talk

· Hazardous waste landfills are waste disposal units constructed to be secure repositories for material that present a serious hazard to human health, such as high-level radioactive waste. With this type, the law restricts the kinds of waste it may handle.

·  Sanitary landfills (also called modern, engineered or secure landfills) usually have physical barriers such as liners, collection systems and procedures to protect the public from exposure to the disposed waste. The term sanitary landfill normally refers to those where municipal solid waste is disposed of, as well as other wastes high in organic material.

·  Inert waste landfills are waste-disposal units that receive waste which are chemically and physically stable and do not undergo decomposition, such as sand, bricks, concrete or gravel.

·  Dumps (simply called landfills) are landfills that are not engineered with the special protective measures required by sanitary landfills. They are most common in rural, remote and developing areas.

Local practice

In the Philippines, sanitary landfills are commonly used in disposing medical wastes and solid wastes in general. Some local authorities have found it difficult to locate new landfills. These authorities may charge a fee or levy in order to discourage waste and to recover the costs of site operations. Some landfills are operated for profit as commercial businesses. Many landfills, however, are publicly operated and funded. Locating new landfills is also among the major concerns of local government units.

Rizal Governor Casimiro Ynares 3rd and Metro Manila Development Authority Chairman Bayani Fernando are currently discussing the authorities’ request for the Rodriguez landfill to accommodate Metro Manila trash for six more months. If talks go sour, trash coming from Makati, Pasig, Mandaluyong and San Juan will most likely be affected.

On the other hand, officials from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and members of environmental groups believe the operation of landfills should be monitored, controlled and operated.

“We need the support of local government officials to effectively implement the solid waste management law. Local executives may identify alternative and suitable sites in place of their present open dumps in conformity with the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act 9003,” a DENR official said, referring to the law, which is also known as the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000.

RA 9003 also provides that all local governments are mandated to convert their open dumps into controlled dumps in accordance with the guidelines set in Section 41 of this law, particularly the Criteria for Establishing a Sanitary Landfill.

In view of the risks inherent to open dumping activities especially to the health of the people living nearby and the environment, all open dumps should be closed, cleaned up and rehabilitated, the environment department added.

Heap of problems

Like incineration, a number of adverse impacts occur from landfill operations. These impacts can vary from accidents to toxic waste emission. One of the most celebrated landfill-related accidents is the Payatas landfill landslide. On July 10, 2000, tragedy literally befell a slum community in Payatas, Quezon City, where a hill of garbage overlooking the area caved in, killing 218 people and leaving 300 families homeless, scavengers included.

“In rural areas, the proliferation of garbage dumps has also taken over forest areas, watersheds, and even coastal zones, spreading leachate to otherwise productive soil and water resources and emitting toxic gases into the air,” Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment (Kalikasan PNE) national coordinator Clemente Bautista Jr. said.

“The waste crisis is worsening at a rapid rate. The national government has so far failed to provide and implement a wide-reaching and viable waste management program which can efficiently process and treat around 13 billion kilos of solid wastes generated annually by around 89 million Filipinos,” Bautista added.

In 2006, then-environment and natural resources Secretary Angelo Reyes issued a warning to residents of Smokey Mountain in Manila’s Tondo district after experts reported that a huge amount of methane is trapped under the former dump. This could be torched by accident and could result in an explosion that would kill people and destroy property.

Methane—a colorless, odorless gas—is used primarily as fuel, such as the cooking gas or liquefied petroleum gas used in households. Concentrations of methane can be found anywhere in natural surroundings. Experts confirmed that Smokey Mountain residents, who now comprise 30,000 families, are exposed daily not only to the dangers of a methane explosion. They are also at risk of contracting cancer or other serious diseases because of poor sanitation.

All waste disposal methods have their advantages and disadvantages. No matter what waste disposal method is used—incineration or landfills—society cannot deny the fact that both pose negative effects biologically to both man and his environment. The best method of reducing waste disposals’ negative effect on society is perhaps simply to prevent garbage generation.

   

The Manila Times National Essay-Writing Competition 2007

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: