The Manila Times

Life & Times

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

 

MARTIAL TALK
By Perry Gil S. Mallari
The reality of edged weapon survival

 
Igot a brief, uneasy pause from my editor when I mentioned that the topic of the very first issue of my column is knife fighting. I understand his concern; the Wednesday publication is dedicated to health and wellness. But this is about public safety.

Now that throngs of people will flock to self-defense classes this summer, many of them teaching defense against knife attacks, it is best to present to the public the grizzly reality of knife fighting.

A knife or any edged weapon in the hand of an aggressor is a deadly threat. A ubiquitous implement, the knife is the most common weapon used in the commission of various crimes. On a global perspective, investigators of the 9/11 tragedy believe that the hijackers of the planes used in the attacks employed box cutters and plastic knives to accomplish their goals.

Edged weapons can inflict lethal injuries. Guy N. Rutty, in his book Essential of Autopsy Practice says, “Stab wounds are generally more dangerous than cuts because they are more likely to penetrate body cavities, injuring internal organs and associated blood vessels.” I grew up near a butchers’ bunker and I witnessed early in life the bloody havoc that ensued from alcohol fueled knife fights.

In the United States, law enforcement officers are justified to shoot a suspect armed with a knife if the offender refuses to surrender his weapon and breach the distance of 21 feet. In the self-defense training exercise known as Tueller Drill, it was repeatedly proven that an individual with a knife can bridge the 21-foot gap and manage to stab an officer before he could deploy his handgun. The Tueller Drill was invented by American police officer Sgt. Dennis Tueller and the result of the tests he conducted was published in SWAT Magazine in 1983.

Forget all the flash and bravado of Hollywood; it is impossible to disarm a trained knife fighter bare-handedly. Though there are “empty hand against knife drills” in most styles of Filipino martial arts (FMA), their main aim is to develop combat attributes like reflex and sensitivity.

In the FMA, the best way to face an armed opponent is to pick up a weapon yourself. There is a combat principle unique to the FMA called “defanging the snake,” which simply means hitting the hand holding the weapon. The premise of this technique is if you defang a snake, it will become harmless, if you destroy your enemy’s capability to hold a weapon, then he is no longer a threat. This principle should be a main staple in any impact or bladed weapon training.

If you’re attending self-defense clinics this summer that teach knife defense, evaluate the course material thoroughly for practicality. Functional knife fighting is simple and no-nonsense. Shun any instructors who promise a foolproof formula in dealing with the threat of edged weapons. As the Tueller Drill has proven, even a holstered handgun is no guarantee.

I got a common response from a number of real-life fighters whom I have asked regarding the best response to a knife attack; “Run without shame,” they say.

A recent study conducted by the Los Angeles Police Department have shown that officers in barefoot pursuit are likely to lose a suspect who can run non-stop for 400 meters. With that said, work on your sprinting ability. Running is a good self-defense option indeed.

   

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: