The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Friday, April 04, 2008

 

Rice tariff may be cut 
to 12% but traders may not bite

By Chino S. Leyco, Reporter

Government may decide to cut rice tariff up to 12 percent, but commercial importers fear this will not give them a bigger margin and may choose not to import at all, officials said Thursday.

Finance Secretary Margarito Teves said at zero tariff, rice will be retailed at P34 per kilo, significantly higher compared to state-subsidized rice sold by the National Food Authority at P18.25 a kilo.

He cited that with the current $700 per metric ton price of rice in the world market, importers might not bite the government’s offer.

“At about 12 percent [tariff], it would be revenue neutral. Lower than that, may impact na sa amin [it will impact on us]. We’re faced with a situation where we have to make a quick decision,” Teves told reporters.

Initial Finance department computation suggests that at about $700 per metric ton, importers will find it extremely difficult to make money, even if the government removes the entire tariff duty.

Trying to see if government can use the formula adopted for oil products, Teves said the situation in rice is different. Tariff reduction for rice will have to undergo a very long process with the Tariff Commission. It may even require public consultation, especially with local farmers.

The potential rice shortage seen by government is assuming critical dimensions, though.

“There’s a need to quickly bring in that rice,” Teves said. “There’s a process involved in reducing the tariff at whatever level. We go to a hearing, and that includes farmers. We have to convince them that there’s a reason for reducing tariff. The process is longer. It could be cumbersome.”

What’s important now, he said, is how to dampen speculations that there is a crisis already as it results in public and trader perception that rice will be scarce in days to come.

“There is more temptation to hoard it, therefore [precipitating] or [contributing] to a rise in price. Whereas if consumers and traders feel that rice is forthcoming, it might also encourage them to [tell] themselves [that] if the rice will come, I better dispose [of] my rice [quickly]. Otherwise, I might lose because I held my rice longer,” he said.

“If you prolong it, and you don’t make the decision quickly, each day there’s pressure on the prices. If it’s the present scheme, which is not to bring down tariff—simple, the government just have to import. It’s a matter of sourcing,” Teves explained.

The Finance secretary said the only solution is to convince the private sector to import more rice. However, he said that they perceive that if an importer enters the business now, they will not make money.

“Even if you remove [tariff duty], will consumers buy rice at a [higher] price? Can the consumers absorb it?” Teves asked.

It will be more practical to import rice now even at about 50-percent duties because the major consideration is to bring in rice quickly, he said.

“Right now, the allocation budget, at about P7.5 billion, will take care of it,” Teves said.

The National Food Authority has programmed a 2.7 million metric ton rice importation this year, and 600,000 metric tons will be imported by the private sector.

   

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: