Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, April 06, 2008

 

CENTER OF GRAVITY
By Rony V. Diaz
The coming water crisis

 
Camille Rose A. Ignacio of this paper wrote on March 24 that the day may come when water would be dearer than crude oil.

Earlier, on March 22, World Water Day, Ban Ki Moon, the secretary-general of the United Nations, declared that “…today, fresh water resources are stretched thin. Population growth will make the problem worse. So will climate change. As the global economy grows, so will its thirst.”

Both are right—up to a point. It’s true that because of overuse and pollution the traditional sources of fresh water—aquifers, rivers, lakes, dams—might not be enough to meet the ever increasing needs of agriculture, industry and households.

Already, the Philippines is experiencing water stress. The latest symptom was the outbreak of typhoid fever in two provinces. Both epidemics were traced to contaminated water.

This said, there’s a major source of water that remains to be tapped—if not for crop irrigation—at least for drinking and cooking. This is the sea.

I hasten to add that we should continue to be miserly in our use of water. Fresh water is getting scarcer. More efficient methods of irrigation have to be found. Water sources should be kept pristine. The price of water must be revised upward.

Unless I completely misread the reports of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), global warming will not shut down the water cycle. Rain will continue to fall, not perhaps in the usual places and seasons, but the oceans will continue to be replenished.

The technologies to remove salt from seawater are well known. They are distillation and reverse osmosis. The first involves boiling seawater and then condensing the vapors. The second works by pumping seawater at high pressure through a filter or a membrane to separate the salt from the water. Both are energy-intensive, expensive to maintain, and produce large amounts of salt that are not easy to get rid of.

There’s a third method. It’s called low-temperature thermal desalination (LTTD). The basic idea is simple. Water at the surface of the ocean in the tropics is warm, averaging between 26° and 30°C. However, at 350 meters below the surface the temperature is about 13°C. Surface water is pumped into a vacuum where the low pressure causes some of the water to vaporize. In another chamber, cold water drawn from the depths condenses the vapor into fresh water. This is how nature makes rain.

LTTD is something of a serendipitous technology. It derives from an idea proposed in 1881 by the French physicist, Jacques d’ Arsonval, that was revived when the need for a cheaper energy source became pressing. However, converting ocean thermal energy into electricity was not economic even at $80 per barrel of crude oil.

This did not stop the US and Japan from experimenting with the technology for proof of concept. However, LTTD, the offshoot, has proved to be commercially viable. A thermal desalination plant had been operating in Italy since the early 1990s. LLTD did not win any adherents—except in India.

Over a year ago, the National Institute of Ocean Technology of India (NIOT) built such a plant on the island of Kavaratti. It produced about 100,000 liters of fresh water a day but it used 30 percent more energy per unit of water than a reverse osmosis plant did. NIOT’s engineers thought that by scaling up the technology a 100-fold the cost may be brought down.

To test this hypothesis, a one-million-liter per day plant was built on a floating barge off the cost of Chennai. A 60-day trial proved their point. NIOT today is inviting investors to build a 10-million-liter per day facility that would bring down the cost to about $1 per 1,000 liters. This is 25-percent cheaper than reverse osmosis.

Some experts are skeptical but they agree that a scaled-up project is worth pursuing.

Since the Kavaratti plant became operational, NIOT had been able to produce enough fresh water two hours a day for 11,000 islanders.

An important side benefit was a 50-percent drop in diarrhea incidence. The island’s septic tanks have polluted the shallow water table.

The Chennai plant is the bigger economic test. BEFESA, a Spanish water company, is building nearby a 100-million-liter reverse osmosis plant.

NIOT officials are not fazed. Given the acute need for water in many parts of India, their experiments are being watched eagerly.

Our own water authorities—if they are not yet aware of the experiments on Kavaratti and Chennai—might want to look into low-temperature thermal desalination technology for possible application in the Philippines.

My take is there will be no water shortage—it will just become more expensive but it will not be as costly as gasoline or diesel fuel.

mlatimes@gmail.com

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: