The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Monday, April 07, 2008

 

BIG DEAL
By Dan Mariano
Natural response to danger

 
FIFTEEN judges in the Philippines have been murdered since 1999, invariably ambushed by gun-wielding killers. It is not yet clear how many of those murder cases have been solved. In all likelihood, none of them has.

Instead of merely bewailing inept law enforcement and blaming the executive branch for all those crimes, the judiciary has chosen to adopt a proactive policy. Last week, the Supreme Court issued a four-page resolution authorizing judges to carry firearms for self-defense. In addition, the tribunal has earmarked an initial P10 million for handgun loans to make it easier for judges to buy their own firearms.

The resolution allowing judges to carry firearms and extending easy-term handgun loans to them is just the latest of several measures taken by the judiciary to ensure the safety of its members.

Late last year judges underwent training in personal security and marksmanship. Earlier Chief Justice Reynato Puno issued a memorandum on security protocols for judges.

Total gun ban

It probably never meant to do so, but the S.C. resolution has strengthened the position of pro-gun groups campaigning against a total gun-ban bill pending in the House of Representatives.

The bill, authored by Nueva Ecija Rep. Nonato Joson, also seeks to promote the use of non-lethal weapons by law enforcers.

During a hearing of the House public order and safety committee last month, the pro-gun groups pointed out that a total gun ban would be “more dangerous as civilians, particularly those whose lives are in imminent danger from criminals, would become defenseless.

Pressing home their point, the pro-gun group asked Joson if he and other lawmakers would also be willing to disarm their family members, children and other relatives. The congressman was reportedly stumped.

Advocates of a so-called “gunless society” often invoke the example of the United States and its comparatively lax restrictions on firearms as an example of a gun-obsessed nation gone berserk. Media coverage of campus shootings, for instance, has certainly reinforced that terrifying image.

In fact, statistics show otherwise.

The 1996 Demographic Yearbook, published by the United Nations, contains a list of murder rates in 86 countries. According to researcher David C. Stolinsky in his article “America: The Most Violent Nation?” a number of countries show higher murder rates than the U.S.

In his article “The Numbers Speak for Themselves,” writer John Hay Rabb cited a 1997 US Justice Department report on murders in the America, which has a murder rate of seven victims per 100,000 population per year.

“There are a number of well-known examples of countries with more liberal gun laws and lower murder rates than the U.S.,” Rabb said. “One is Finland, with a murder rate of 2.9. Israel is another example; although its population is heavily armed, Israel’s murder rate is only 1.4. In Switzerland, gun ownership is a way of life. Its murder rate is 2.7.”

Gun restrictions

In contrast, Rabb cited several countries that restrict gun ownership.

In Brazil, all firearms must be registered with the government through a process that can take from 30 days to three months. Civilian handguns are limited in caliber to no more than 9mm, among many other restrictions. Still, Brazil’s murder rate is 19 per 100,000 people per year.

In Cuba, the Communist regime bans citizens from owning any sort of firearm. “Still, “Rabb said, “somebody in Cuba is obtaining guns and using them to murder fellow citizens. Cuba’s murder rate is 7.8.”

In the former Soviet state of Lithuania citizens must obtain a police permit to buy a gun, which must be registered with the government. Lithuania has a murder rate of 11.7.

In Mexico, Rabb said, “gun laws are simply draconian.” No civilian may own a gun larger than .22 caliber, and a permit is required to buy one. All guns are registered with the Ministry of Defense. Guns may not be carried in public, either openly or concealed. “Mexico’s murder rate is an eye-popping 17.5.”

In Russia, private handgun ownership is totally prohibited. A permit is required to purchase a long gun. All guns are registered with authorities. When transporting a long gun, it must be disassembled. Long guns may only be used for self-defense when the gun owner is on his own property. “By the way, Russia’s murder rate is a staggering 30.6,” Rabb said.

“What anti-gunners all over the world fail to understand is that people everywhere are basically the same in one important respect,” Rabb said. “They are determined to protect themselves and their families.”

Rabb concluded: “If their governments will not allow them to have firearms for self-defense, then they may obtain guns illegally, even at the risk of harsh punishment. It is a natural human response to danger.”

dansoy26@yahoo.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: