The Manila Times

Metro

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Monday, April 28, 2008

 

Court poised to execute
arrest warrant vs. Nani

By Jomar Canlas, Reporter

THE Sandiganbayan is poised to execute today the warrant of arrest against former Justice Secretary Hernando “Nani” Perez, unless the Supreme Court grants his petition for a temporary restraining order—which seems unlikely.

Perez’s petition for certiorari asking the Supreme Court to restrain the Sandiganbayan from proceeding with the case and the arrest warrant that had gone to the High Court’s Third Division, instead of an en banc session, a reliable source, who asked not to be identified, told The Manila Times.

The case will not be heard by the Court en banc, since the case involves an ordinary criminal case and is not a capital offense.

The court is unlikely to grant a restraining order, since the third division will not hold sessions today and Wednesday, the source told The Times. Justice Consuelo Yñares-Santiago, chairman of the division, reportedly cancelled sessions on those days because Justice Alicia Austria-Martinez, one of its members, will be out of town.

Another source, who also did not wish to be identified, said a criminal case is normally not restrained by the Supreme Court, unlike civil and special proceedings cases. The filing of charges made by the Office of the Ombudsman and the Department of Justice are upheld unless “there is grave abuse of discretion.”

Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Diosdado Peralta said unless a restraining order is issued, the anti-graft court is not precluded from issuing a warrant of arrest against Perez.

He said the Sandiganbayan can proceed with the graft case against Perez, and all he can do is ask the court for bail.

Earlier Friday, the Sandiganbayan First Division reportedly issued warrants of arrest and requests to the Bureau of Immigration for hold departure orders against Perez, his wife Rosario, in-law Ramon Arceo and business associate Ernest Escaler in relation to the graft and extortion cases filed against them by the Office of the Ombudsman.

Perez filed a motion for the suspension of proceedings, arguing there was a pending petition before the Supreme Court relating to his claim that there was grave abuse of discretion by the Office of the Ombudsman.

The Sandiganbayan First Division is now handling one of the two graft charges filed against Perez in connection to the $2-million extortion charge filed by former Manila Rep. Mark Jimenez.

The Perez case involving robbery-ex­tortion was raffled to the anti-graft court’s Second Division, chaired by Justice Edilberto Sandoval. The other graft case is now pending with the Fourth Division, chaired by Justice Gre­gory Ong, and the charges on the alleged falsification of public docu­ments case went to the Third Division, chaired by Justice Francisco Villaruz.

   

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

OFW Gifts

philflora.gif

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: