The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

 

EAST WEST
By Julius F. Fortuna
Manila back to Tripoli Agreement


ONE of the most significant news in recent days is the announcement by Malaysia that it was withdrawing as intermediary in the talks between the Philippine government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front.

Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak has said that the Malaysian team monitoring the talks (and acting as peacekeeping force) would start a phased withdrawal sometime in August or September.

The announcement ruffled feelings in the Philippines. A member of the RP negotiating team complained that it was wrong for the Malaysians to have made the announcement without first informing the Philippines.

Besides, the Malaysians did not explain their reasons for withdrawing. That is why a member of the Philippine panel was emboldened to speculate that perhaps the Malaysians were pressuring the Philippine government. Kuala Lumpur apparently wants the Philippine government to sign the draft agreement between the MILF and the government.

But the Philippines cannot sign the draft accord because it has considered the whole peace process in Mindanao. For instance, how does one reconcile the draft accord with the Tripoli Agreement and the 1996 accord signed by MNLF chairman Nur Misuari and the government? Obviously, the two agreements have contradictory provisions, or at the least, they overlap.

With this new development, the government has been forced to reactivate its relations with Tripoli through former Libyan envoy to RP Salem Adem. Some government negotiators are saying that the breakup of Malaysia could be a blessing in disguise as it helped the Philippines get out of the Malaysian bind.

The RP negotiators are saying that from the very start of the talks, Malaysia was favoring the MILF versus the MNLF. In short, Malaysia had a political agenda for volunteering as facilitator and peacekeeping force. Now, its agenda may have been revealed in this latest development.

I also see a difference in the stand of Malaysia as compared to Middle East intermediaries like Libya. While Libya wants partial autonomy—and this is made clear in the Tripoli Accord—Malaysia wants full autonomy for the Muslim rebels. Could it be that Malaysia wants a friendly buffer zone located near its borders?

Defer Cheap Medicines Bill

I think that the move by Speaker Prospero Nograles to defer the Cheap Medicines Bill is sound. There is no sense in passing a law that would not insure that medicines will become cheap.

Nograles said that if there is no assurance of cheaper medicines, “I think that it will be best to defer its ratification because I don’t see the point of passing a law that won’t serve its purpose.” Nograles will go to Cebu to meet President Arroyo and Senate President Manny Villar.

The bill is a toothless measure if signed into law. The interest of the medical practitioners to make more money and profit at the expense of the patients has been upheld in the law because of the removal of the generics-only provision. And now, the need for a regulatory body has also been set aside.

The Cheap Medicines Bill essentially supports the stand of the profit-seekers. The law is useless and should be reviewed.

New racket in Romblon

We just came from a vacation in Romblon where we found out a new racket among officials. This new technique is called desilting (or removing the soil and small rocks in mouth of rivers).

In an apparent attempt to make money, some officials have invented a problem among the rivers of the islands of Sibuyan and Tablas. And this problem is how to remove the sediments that have accumulated in the rivers. Under the guise of making the rivers efficient, these officials have asked the national government to finance projects to remove these silts.

And how much does a minor desilting cost the government? Insiders have told me that desilting a small river was given a budget of P10 million. But in practice, the contractors only spend about P500 thousand for this project. The rest of the P9.5 million are shared among corrupt officials. An insider told me that the desilting racket may be worse than the lahar scam in Central Luzon.

The insiders told me that the desilting operation in the province this year was given a budget of around P800 million. But the source calculates that once this project is over, the rivers would remain as silted as it was before. Calling the Commission on Audit to do its job!

jules42na@yahoo.com

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: