The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Friday, August 15, 2008

 

ENTHUSIASMS & FOREBODINGS
By Rene Q. Bas
Esperon’s costly mistakes

 
Last week and on Monday, it became clear—from retired Generals Ermita, Esperon and Garcia’s failure to give satisfactory answers to honest questions asked by House allies of the administration— that the government should renegotiate the highly flawed draft of the MOA-AD.

But on Wednesday Presidential Peace Adviser Esperon ruled out renegotiation.

A Philippine Information Agency news story published in the official Mala­cañang website tells of Gen. Esperon’s resolve to overcome the Supreme Court’s TRO on the MOA-AD.

The story reiterates the Malacãnang view that the MOA-AD is “just one part of the negotiations and is also just a document that still [sic] need enabling laws passed by the Congress before it gets implemented.”

“Nevertheless, this MOA is considered by both panels from the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front [MILF] as a very important building block in the Mindanao peace process,” the story by Mai Gevera says.

Haphazard thinking

That Palace thinking is haphazard. In fact, the MILF leaders insist that the “ancestral domain agreement is a done deal” because it has been initialed by Esperon and the chief of the GRP peace panel, Gen. Garcia. The MILF and the international community, they say, expect the government to honor its word.

“Esperon is against the suggestion of some politicians calling for a re-negotiation as this would only mean prolonging the peace process and that would bring back the country to where it first started many years ago,” the PIA story also says.

These politicians are obviously the three representatives from Mindanao who filed a House resolution urging the government to renegotiate because the people of the 700-plus villages that the government is ceding to the so-called Bangsamoro Juridical Entity must first be consulted.

These three are South Cotabato Rep. Darlene Antonino-Custodio, North Cotabato Rep. Emmylou Taliño-Mendoza, and Zamboanga City Rep. Maria Isabelle Climaco. They are supported by other congressmen/women who agree that there should be a renegotiation with the MILF—including Muslims.

These three lady legislators believe that the shooting war in North Cotabato would not have happened had the government not concealed the facts from the people.

Esperon apparently believes, unde­mo­­cratically and in violation of the laws upholding the people’s right to information, that there is no need for the people to be told now about things that affect their lives and their future because anyway they will be consulted later in a plebiscite.

Fascist plebiscites

There is big hole in the retired general’s knowledge of how democracy—republican democracy as opposed to the pretend democracy of fascist states—works.

This goes also for those in the Palace and their allies everywhere who have debased the balance of power among the branches of government by making “executive privilege” a license to keep secrets from the citizenry.

“We fought for a plebiscite because this is the highest form of consultation in our democracy,” Esperon is quoted by Gevera as saying. What?

The plebiscite—like an election—is the final process of determining what the electorate’s decision is. Before the plebiscite, the citizens are supposed to contribute their inputs. If there are facts to be learned before they can make an informed contribution, these must be made known to them. Just as before an election, the people must be allowed to know who the candidates are and what they stand for. Democracy is giving citizens the right to make informed decisions.

Are the plebiscites in Gen. Esperon’s mind those that were held in the Marcos Martial Law regime, in the Third Reich and in the Soviet Union?

Sorry about that, Ma’am

This column and editorials of this paper have pointed out the treasonous parts of the MOA-AD. In the House, Esperon and Garcia were berated for excluding the words “Philippine Constitution” from the MOA-AD.

Rep. Maria Isabelle Climaco demanded an explanation for the inclusion of areas in her city where the City Hall, the City Government complex, the BIR regional Office, the Main Office of the Land Bank of the Philippines, the Commission on Audit, Bank of the Philippine Island, the Port Areas, Public Market, a children’s hospital, a college, the Metropolitan Cathedral, the Fort Pilar Shrine, the Ateneo de Zamboanga University, the big department stores, commercial banks and the residences of many of Zamboanga’s top leaders are located.

Esperon could not explain it. But he admitted that yielding these key areas to the MILF was a mistake.

Yet, he is against renegotiation?

rqb@manilatimes.net
rq_bas@yahoo.com

   
 

The PSE-Manila Times Equity Challenge 2008

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: