The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Friday, August 29, 2008

 

ENTHUSIASMS &FOREBODINGS
By Rene Q. Bas

Loose logic and arbitrary thinking

 
Lies and loose logic, arbitrary thinking, have caused some wise people to present atrocious positions about the Mindanao situation.

On who started the present fighting:

The MILF central leadership’s line is that the present fighting began because “Christian CVOs” attacked withdrawing forces under MILF commanders Bravo and Ombra Kato.

This line has been accepted even by some supposedly neutral commentators, officials and churchmen.

At least Eid Kabalu is honest enough to say that a thorough investigation must be conducted by the GRP-MILF ceasefire committee to find out the truth.

It is also treated as holy writ that Ombra Kato and his men did what they did (and Ombra Kato now says he did not authorize nor order his men to attack, invade and kill) out of frustration over the Supreme Court’s TRO that kept the MOA-AD from being signed on August 5.

But people on the ground swear that MILF forces began harassing the North Cotabato barangays as early as July 1.

Archbishop Quevedo

A former president of the CBCP, Archbishop Orlando Quevedo is a man of peace and wisdom. His article about the MOA-AD is in today’s the Moro Times. His suggestions must be given weight.

As a man of Mindanao roots (my grandfather built Dinas town with his Suban-on Man Friday and other co-workers; my siblings and cousins are still in Misamis Occidental and Oriental, the Zamboangas, Bukidnon, and Lanao del Norte, and Davao City), I share the good archbishop’s concerns about letting the Mindanao peace process die.

His article asks us to reflect on some points.

I will only pick some.

“Are we, Christian Filipinos, aware that even before the Spaniards came, the Bangsamoro people already had a system of political authority that held sway over a domain that covered most parts of Mindanao and Sulu?”

First, it worries me that (like the MILF central leaders) the term “Christian” is used as a mere demographic category for a kind of Filipino human being.

The MILF claims “Christian CVOs” and “Christian CAFGUs” and “Christian soldiers” have done very bad things. This is just like the way English-language print media have referred to criminals as “Muslim bandits” and “Muslim pirates” in the days before the rule now banning that kind of reference.

Can you call the murderers who exacted wrongful vengeance on Muslims “Christian”?

If, the good archbishop really means “we, Christian Filipinos” is he limiting the readership of his article to those of us who struggle to really follow Our Lord Jesus Christ’s teachings; among Catholics, those who go to Mass on Sundays and holy days of obligations and go to confession as soon as they have committed a mortal or deliberate venial sin?

This may sound like nit picking. But it is very relevant because many of those who know a bit more than the general newspaper reader are aware that the conflict in the Muslim-majority areas of Mindanao has to do with economic and in particular, land-ownership issues. It does not have much to do with the players’ religious affiliations. It has much more to do with the possibility of Liguasan Marsh having a lot of oil and natural gas under it.

Yes, there are some who go to Mass daily and to confession once a week, who feel bad that their fellow Christians (this time, really serious Christians) may find their homes located in the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity—if and when the future Comprehensive Pact is approved by a plebiscite, following all the constitutional strictures. I don’t think these real Christians are going to bear arms against their fellow Filipinos who are Moros.

I only offer this perspective to make those who will reflect on the issues, as Archbishop Que­vedo suggests, that they should better also reflect on the authenticity of their adherence to their Christian faith. It will help preserve the peace in Mindanao.

Reading in a vacuum

Archbishop Quevedo’s points also include the following:

“Does Bangsamoro self-determination and exercise of sovereignty in their ancestral domain necessarily mean political independence from the Republic of the Philippines?”

Yes. For one does not read texts in a vacuum. One has to listen to the voices of Eid Kabalu, Mohag­her Iqbal and others who have clearly stated that they (who co-authored the MOA-AD) don’t care about the “internal problems” of the GRP and its component Supreme Court, Congress and other subdivisions because they are a revolutionary organization which is changing the political and economic status and identify of the Bagsamoro people.

“Does the MOA-AD say that the Bangsamoro Juridical Entity is a separate and independent State? Does it intend to set up such a State?”

Yes, and such remaking will be perfected in the Comprehensive Pact to be fashioned under Terms of References that include documents that the MILF leaders abhor and do not honor. Does that not bode ill for the future of the Comprehensive Pact and its consequences?

In any case, my prayer is for the peace process to continue and for the MILF to withdraw from its position that “GRP efforts to renegotiate the MOA-AD” will cause war!
rqb@manilatimes.net rq_bas@yahoo.com

   
 

The PSE-Manila Times Equity Challenge 2008

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: