Special Report

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, December 07, 2008

 

Boom in nursing education 
began quality decline

By Frank Lloyd Tiongson, Reporter

NURSING is seen as the best choice for a tremendous number of would-be college students in this country.

The Manila landscape, for one, seems like a sea of white uniforms in their daily commute; almost everyone is eager for their share of the career’s promises and the allure of working abroad with high pay.

Schools have been more than happy to oblige, some even diversifying to nursing programs where previously they offered computer courses.

In no other decade has the term “diploma mill” resounded as ominously as it does now.

Ironically, the “boom” has spelled the decline of nursing education as many schools treat the course as a veritable goldmine.

There are 456 nursing schools in the Philippines, according to the Commission on Higher Education (CHED).

From just 40 nursing schools in the 1970s to 251 in 2003, the number has increased “logarithmically” in the last five years, says Dr. Gene Nisperos, vice chairman of the Health Alliance for Democracy (HEAD), a grouping of health-care professionals.

Based on the number of board examiners, there are 80,000 to 100,000 nursing students each year, an increasing figure “because of a large number of examinees failing each year,” Nisperos added.

Historically, Nisperos said, the Philippines had been a prime source of nurses worldwide, particularly during the 1970s. In the last five years, however, the global demand for nurses has intensified and more than eight out of 10 Filipino nurses now work abroad.

The large demand is due to the standard nurse-to-patient ratio in developed countries as well as a “general disinterestedness” in nursing. An aging population also spurs the need for more health-care professionals such as caregivers and nurses.

And starting in 1998, health maintenance organizations abroad employed more nurses than doctors to save on operating costs, Nisperos said.

Passing-rate plunge

The “boom” in the nursing profession did not mean improved education here. According to CHED tallies, the national passing rate from 2004 to 2007 hovered around 50 percent—49.40 percent in 2004, 51.69 percent in 2005, 45.17 percent in 2006 and 45.44 percent in 2007.

There was a plunge from the high rates of 1970s and 1980s. Then the national passing rate ranged from 80 to 90 percent.

A 2006 HEAD study revealed that around half of the total number of nursing schools in the country registered a passing rate of less than 50 percent. The group also identified 20 schools that consistently registered a passing rate below 30 percent.

Nisperos, meanwhile, traced the proliferation of poorly performing nursing schools to CHED’s low standard. The commission merely requires schools to maintain their passing rates above 30 percent, he pointed out.

The Higher Education Act of 1994 mandates CHED to “monitor and evaluate the performance of programs and institutions of higher learning for appropriate incentives as well as the imposition of sanctions such as, but not limited to, diminution or withdrawal of subsidy, recommendation on the downgrading or withdrawal of accreditation, program termination or school closure.”

CHED Chairman Emmanuel Angeles says the commission is not remiss in upholding the standard of nursing education. “At the moment, [CHED’s] authority is clipped due to the court injunction on the giving of sanctions to nonperforming nursing schools,” he explains.

Nisperos also attributes the declining quality of nursing education to a “dearth in faculty.” He claims that “a lot of faculty, especially clinical instructors, are leaving or planning on leaving the country for a job abroad.”

According to a HEAD survey, 85 to 90 percent of nursing faculty members are planning to work abroad.

Angeles blames the lower passing rate to the “inadequacy of qualified” hospitals where nurses train.

He also cites as recurring issues the open admission policies or poor screening in most schools, limited laboratory and library facilities as well as the lack of training on the use of modern equipment that continue to characterize many nursing schools.

To curb the proliferation of sub-standard nursing schools, CHED put in place in May 2004 a moratorium on new nursing programs.

Big business

Nursing education costs an average of P40,000 per semester. Students shoulder staggering affiliation fees to gain clinical experience in hospitals, as well as buying the required equipment such as stethoscopes from the school itself.

Some schools, according to Nisperos, even requires pre-board examinations for its students. Those who fail are asked to re-enroll for another in-house review class for which the student again pays for.

This has never been done before, he says, as schools maintained acceptable passing rates.

Enrollment in review centers, both in or outside schools, has almost become mandatory to compensate for the poor quality of instruction in most nursing schools. On average, a review course costs P13,000.

Considering the large white sea of nursing students in the country, schools and review centers have practically become multimillion- peso industries instead of serious educational institutions.

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Ping Oco, Franklin Bartolay
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: