The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Saturday, February 16, 2008

 

LAW AND PHILOSOPHY MATTER(S)
By Atty.  Emmanuel Q. Fernando
Two widows in love


Living and sharing thoughts with my mother since she had been widowed has gifted me with a fresher and fuller perspective on aging, life and love.  I also have lately enjoyed some stimulating conversation with former first lady Imelda Romualdez-Marcos.  This Valentine week, I thought I might share some of my observations about them and love.

What struck me most about the former President Ferdinand E. Marcos’ relationship with Imelda is that he revealed to her only his best side.  Unlike his behavior with his bosom buddies, he seemed never to ever let his guard down.

This was so when they first met in Congress in 1954.  Ferdinand, as a minority congressman, was delivering one of his fiery speeches against an administration Magsaysay bill, when he spotted her in the gallery.  She was there to watch her cousin, Speaker pro tempore Daniel Romualdez, preside over Congress.  He argued particularly eloquently that day.  They were introduced later that evening in the cafeteria, after which he told his friends that he was in love.

They married eleven days later.  After the meeting in Congress, he pursued her relentlessly following her up to Baguio.  When he proposed marriage, he declared his undying love for her.  Imelda replied: “How could this be true love if you had only just met me?”

He countered that he had known her a long time.  Firmly etched in his mind was the image of the ideal woman or soul mate.  This image accompanied him in his waking life and haunted him in his dreams.  Her lovely visage first glimpsed in the gallery was the perfect match.

On one date, he gazed at her intently and spoke sweet nothings incessantly. Both of them ordered chicken.  So enamored was he that he did not even touch his food.  Meanwhile, Imelda was so hungry that she ate what he ordered.  He did not notice.  That was the clincher.  He must truly be in love with me, she thought, because he is blind to all my flaws.

That captured the essence of their relationship.  Even during marriage, he would either wax poetic or articulate.  The dinners with their children were formal occasions, where he would lecture them in law, politics or military science.  He was like that even in the privacy of their bedroom.

My father, former Chief Justice Enrique M. Fernando, was not as confident about his charms or looks.  Despite his Castilian features and aquiline nose, he was cautious and prudent in his approach.  He impressed women mainly with his mind.

Fortunately for him, my mother was his student.  This also made my mother’s classmates fortunate and doubly so.  He was the quintessential terror in law school.  With her in class, not only was he in a remarkably good mood but also wittier and more brilliant than usual, cracking hilarious jokes or showing off his photographic memory by quoting extensively from the opinions of Justices Cardozo or Holmes.

His circumspection was legendary. He was cryptic in his declarations of love, becoming more forthright the more certain it would be requited.  He gave her the book entitled, I love you, I love you, I love you, with the dedication, “This is one time you should judge a book by its cover,” unsigned.

He proposed marriage by gifting her with the novel, The Best Is Yet, this time unde­dicated and unsigned.  To make sure she got the message, he next gave her Immortal Wife, which he dedicated “To whom the opportunity has been offered,” again unsigned.

Now that he is gone, she, at 84, retains an idealized image of him and their relationship. When she cannot sleep at night, she rereads his letters from Yale.

One of her favorites concerns the time when she encouraged him to stay in Yale to finish his doctorate, after he obtained his Masters in 1948.  He replied: “I find myself unable to see the merit of such a course . . .  My head, I think, is all right.  And my heart, too.  But if you want to dull the former and break the latter, then insist on exiling myself from you longer than is absolutely necessary.”  They married six months later.

My mother is preoccupied, some would say obsessed, about two things.  First, she constantly worries about how they can be together in Loyola Memorial Park upon her passing.  He wished to be buried there beside my elder brother.  He is presently interred in the Libingan ng Mga Bayani.  The other is to vitalize his foundation.

At 78, Imelda too lives only for two things.  The first is to restore her husband’s honor and greatness.  The reason why she has never agreed to a compromise with the government is because she remains firmly convinced that he neither committed graft nor violated human rights.  The other is to uplift the Filipino people by making operational the Marcos Foundation, to which he left the bulk of his estate.  With the government harassment, she is unable to implement her project she titled, No Filipino Poor.

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: