The Manila Times

Metro

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Thursday, February 21, 2008

 

Deputy Ombudsman asked to inhibit self


Lawyer Ernesto Francisco on Wednesday filed an urgent Omnibus Motion for the inhibition of overall Deputy Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro and the body’s suspension of its probe into the scandal-ridden national broadband deal, until the Senate finishes its own investigation.

Casimiro had chaired the investigation of the poll automation controversy, conducted similar “public hearings,” but eventually cleared all officials of the Commission on Elections, including former chairman Benjamin Abalos, even while an Ombudsman lawyer had recommended that all the respondents be held criminally, administratively and civilly liable,” Francisco said in a statement.

Francisco added the Ombudsman should secure all the records of the Senate investigation for it to conduct an honest to goodness probe of the aborted $330-million broadband deal, but this was not done.

“There is a general distrust for the Ombudsman and it is the perception of many that the actuations of the Ombudsman in connection with the ZTE-NBN scam have all the makings of a moro-moro [farcical play], in a manner of speaking,” Francisco warned.

Francisco said that this became very clear at the “preliminary investigation/clarificatory” hearing hastily called by the Ombudsman on February 18, 2008, when the Panel of Investigators created by Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez was forced to admit upon questioning that the Ombudsman, on its own, did not even bother to secure the records of the Senate investigation.

“This omission is highly irregular, considering that the Ombudsman claimed that it had already conducted fact-finding in the instant case and related cases and thus, the 18 February 2008 hearing was supposed to be a ‘preliminary investigation/clarificatory’ hearing already,” Francisco said.

Franciso also argued that Casimiro has compelling reasons to inhibit himself from participating in the probe of the broadband case.

“Overall Deputy Ombudsman Casimiro’s conduct in the past, particularly as regards his handling of the case concerning the P1.3-billion poll automation deal controversy involving the Mega Pacific consortium, creates doubt as regards his capability to act judiciously and with fairness and impartiality,” Francisco said.
--James Konstantin Galvez

   

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

OFW Gifts

philflora.gif

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: