Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Weekend

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, February 24, 2008

 

CENTER OF GRAVITY
By Rony V. Diaz
A better light

 
THE Department of Energy (DOE) estimates that by replacing incandescent bulbs (IBs) with compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), the country could save every year US$300 million in fuel costs; about 2000 megawatts of generated electricity at peak time; $500 million in power consumption; and cut greenhouse gases by 2.5 million tons.

All this is based on DOE’s estimate that 68 million IBs are still in use and that a CFL lasts 5 times longer and uses 80 percent less energy than an IB does.

Sec. Angelo Reyes said that “[t]he calibrated phase-out of IBs will be made within two years in order to achieve reduction in the national energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission as a response to rising oil prices and adverse effects of climate change.”

Well said but I still want to see the plan of action by the Philippine Efficient Lighting Market Transformation Project that was recommended by the recent Energy Summit.

To help promote this policy, I’d like to summarize some bits of technical information that could guide those who are still unsure about CFLs.

For contrasting views on the features of CFLs, I turned to Megaman and Sylvania, two large manufacturers of lighting fixtures.

A common misconception about CFLs is that their life is shortened by frequent switching. This is false. Current standards for CFLs require 3,000 switching cycles per 8,000 hours. This exceeds “normal” household use. Megaman’s heavy duty CFLs are tested for 600,000 switching cycles and 15,000 hours of use.

Another canard is CFLs use more energy during start-up. CFLs use in the first 2 or 3 seconds the same amount of energy as during full operation.

Some consumers complain that CFLs emit a colder, harsher light than IBs do. Megaman does not agree; its CFLs emit the same warm light as do IBs—between 2,600 and 2,80 kelvin. Sylvania however agrees and is trying to add more red to the color spectrum of its CFLs to produce warmer light.

Do CFLs flicker? No, according to Megaman. Their light is consistent, flicker-free, and non-stroboscopic. CFLs have an electronic controller that allows them to operate at high frequency, between 30,000 to 50,000 hertz or cycles per second.

CFLs can’t be dimmed. False, Megaman says. There are new CFLs that can be dimmed with ordinary dimmer switches or even alternately for staged dimming using a standard light switch.

Robert Pai, the head of Sylvania’s research division, admitted in an interview (International Herald Tribune, Feb. 2-3, 2008) that Sylvania has yet to solve the “dimming problem.”

In open spaces, CFLs are better because they produce very little heat compared to IBs. They are also safer for areas that are accessible to children and they do not discolor lampshades, walls, or ceilings. For these reasons, museums prefer them for lighting exhibitions.

In closed spaces, like closets and cabinets, CFLs do get hot and shed bluish-white light. IBs have full spectrum color that’s prettier except that 95 percent of the electricity that passes through it becomes heat. IBs could be made more efficient but it would make them also more expensive. Halogens, for example, cost on average 10 times more than CFLs. Halogens are suited to car headlights and spotlights, functions that CFLs at the moment cannot meet.

The main drawback of CFLs is the presence in them of mercury, a toxic metal. Why do CFLs need mercury? Light is produced by vapor pressure. If there’s little vapor most of the energy becomes heat. But with too much vapor, the light does not dissipate and degenerates into heat. So far, mercury is the only known substance that yields enough vapor pressure to spread light efficiently without heating the lamp.

The 5 milligrams of mercury in CFLs do not sound much. But when millions of them are thrown away, the mercury becomes a real hazard.

If a CFL should break, you should clean up with paper. Do not sweep with a broom or brush or vacuum the debris. Put the broken pieces quickly in a plastic bag and seal it. If the accident happens in a closed room, open the windows to allow fresh air in.

CFLs made by big companies are shatterproof, thus preventing mercury from leaking out in the event of breakage. Unfortunately, cheaper CFLs from low-cost producers are not shatterproof. Silicone protection to prevent shattering is not a feature of most CFLs that are sold in the country. Caveat emptor.

CFLs cannot as yet be recycled in the Philippines. Therefore broken CFLs have to be thrown away with regular trash but see to it that they are in a sealed bag. Megaman says that its lamps can be recycled. Sylvania did not have any information on recycling.

The DOE, as a matter of policy, should require manufacturers to print instructions on handling prominently on the box.

CFLs reduce energy use which in turn reduce mercury emissions from power plants. A virtuous circle.

No one working in lighting today thinks that CFL technology will last as long as IB technology. Since Thomas Edison invented the electric light bulb in 1879, it has been, albeit with extensive modifications, in continuous use.

According to Robert Pai, CFL is probably an intermediate technology. In the face of ever rising oil prices and stronger international pressure to mitigate CO2 emissions, scientists and engineers even now are busy looking for a replacement. The candidate of choice is light emitting diodes (LEDs). They are more efficient than CFLs and do not need toxic components. Their main disadvantage is their light does not diffuse over a large area. Once this problem is overcome, perhaps in the next 10 to 20 years, LEDs may replace CFLs as the better light.

   
 

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: