The Manila Times

Top Stories

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 
 
 

Thursday, January 10, 2008

 

Senators slam oil tariff cut

‘Tokenism, drop in the bucket,’ lawmakers say

By Efren L. Danao Senior Reporter

A number of senators belittled the 1-percent cut in the tariff on oil ordered by President Gloria Arroyo, saying it would barely have an impact on consumers.

Among them were Senators Mar Roxas 2nd, Francis Escudero, Panfilo Lacson and even pro-administration lawmaker Miguel Zubiri.

Sen. Loren Legarda, meanwhile, called for the urgent adoption of alternative sources of energy as a long-term solution to the skyrocketing oil prices, as she described the oil tariff reduction as a mere stop-gap measure.

Referring to the tariff cut, Roxas said, “That is not enough, inadequate, tokenism.”

Finance Secretary Margarito Teves had estimated that the lower tariff would lower fuel prices by 50 centavos a liter and that the government would forgo P11 billion in revenues.

Roxas said the reduction is a good start when Congress is not in session, but he contended that a better alternative is to exempt petroleum products from the expanded value-added tax law.

Without the 12-percent VAT, oil prices would go down by P4 a liter and an 11-kilo liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) tank, by more than P60, he explained.

Teves has rejected Roxas’ bill seeking to suspend and then eliminate the EVAT on petroleum products. He said the loss in government revenues would be substantial, some say P60 billion. While he conceded that the government might later recapture the revenues when consumers have more money to spend, Teves argued that this would take quite a long while.

Seconded by colleagues

Zubiri and Escudero, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Ways and Means, supported Roxas on the exemption of petroleum products from VAT.

Escudero criticized the President for declaring that the 12-percent VAT on oil would stay.

“Because Mrs. Aroyo had dug her trenches on the VAT issue, she should have wiped out the whole 3-percent tariff on oil,” he said.

For her part, Legarda said, “We must come up with long-term solutions because the clock is ticking on not only the country’s, but the entire world’s dependence on oil.”

Legarda, chairman of the Senate Committee on Economic Affairs, has filed bills seeking the development and use of alternative and renewable energy to end the country’s dependence on imported nonrenewable and costly fossil fuel. Scientists have estimated that the worldwide supply of oil may only last from 50 to 100 years depending on how nations use it.

Meanwhile, Lacson proposed a program to distribute fuel discount coupons to public utility drivers only, so that the maximum effect of the tariff cut on oil products will benefit only those who need it most.

He called on the Philippine National Police leadership to intensify efforts to curb and extortion activities that victimize lowly drivers and transport operators.

In GMA’s defense

Roxas is merely politicking for insisting the scrapping of the 12-percent value-added tax on petroleum products, Environment Secretary Lito Atienza said Wednesday.

Atienza, who is defending the Arroyo administration’s position to retain the 12-percent VAT on petroleum products, said the public must scrutinize Roxas’ motive for proposing the removal of tax on fuel.

“He knows very well that that is not the solution,” Atienza said. “But he has to say it over and over again because he is already on the campaign trail.”

Trade Secretary Peter Favila said scrapping the VAT on petroleum products would result to P60 billion forgone revenues for the government.

Quantify measures

The government should quantify the impact of the tariff cut on imported oil in order to make clear message on how it will impact to the government finances and consumer expenditures, said Solita Monsod, professor at the University of the Philippines School of Economics and former chief of the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA).

“There should be meaningful measures from the government, and [it] should quantify the impact if the reduction would be meaningful enough,” Monsod told The Manila Times.

Another thing the government can do is to curb oil smuggling, she added.

“Stopping the smuggling will reduce revenue loss of government,” Monsod explained. “Equivalently it will allow government to have a larger tariff reduction for the same amount of lost revenue.”

Earlier, the Bureau of Customs reported that government loses at least P5 billion a year in duties and taxes on oil smuggling. Petroleum accounts for 13 percent to 15 percent of the bureau’s total revenue collection.

In the coming energy summit, Monsod said government should relay a clear message the impact of the reduction of imported oil price  President Arroyo will convene an energy summit later in January to consult people on how to soften the impact of rising oil prices.
--With Angelo S. Samonte, Maricel E. Burgonio, Darwin G. Amojelar And Sammy Martin

   

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

 
Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: