Special Report

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Special Report

  Top Stories

  Opinion

  World

  Sports

  Career Times

  Property & 
   Home

 
 
 

Sunday, January 13, 2008

 

A few senators struggle to honor
seniors, expand old-age benefits

By Efren L. Danao, Senior Reporter

SOME senators, primarily Sen. Edgardo Angara, are working hard to redress the grievances of senior citizens.

The Constitution recognizes the need to care for senior citizens who, after devoting the more productive years of their lives to family and society, have become vulnerable to diseases, poverty, neglect and criminal violence. Article 15 Section 4 of the Constitution states: “The family has the duty to care for its elderly members but the State may also do so through just programs of social security.”

Unfortunately, there is a dearth of laws to give flesh to this directive.

Two most notable laws provide substantial privileges to senior citizens. These are Republic Act 7432 or the Senior Citizens Law of 1992, authored by Sen. Edgardo Angara and Rep. Edgar Lara of Cagayan, and Republic Act 9257 or the Expanded Senior Citizens Act of 2003 authored by Angara which amended his earlier law.

Angara noted that for years, the senior citizens served and made valuable contributions to the country either as government workers or private-sector employees, overseas workers, or agriculture and industry workers.

“It is our duty to repay their services by making life easier and more comfortable for them,” he said.

He thus conceived of Republic Acts 7432 and 9257 to repay the six-million plus senior citizens and lighten their burdens in the twilight of their years.

These two laws provide wide-ranging benefits to senior citizens, including the grant of 20-percent discount when purchasing goods and services, medical and dental services, transport fare, funeral and burial services, among others. In addition, they are to receive free medical and dental service, diagnostic and laboratory fees in all government facilities, and priority service in all commercial and government establishments.

Some progressive cities like Makati and Quezon City have been giving privileges to senior citizens beyond those enumerated in RA 7432 and RA 9257, like free movies and discounts when they buy groceries.

Generally, however, the privileges ordered by law are seldom honored or are given by commercial establishments only partially.  There is therefore a need for more and better legislation for senior citizens.

Elderly get low priority

Care for the elderly seems to be not among the priorities of most senators of the Fourteenth Congress. Of the 1,987 bills filed in the First Regular Session, only 14 were counted by The Manila Times to pertain to “just programs of social security” for the elderly. Worse, initial indications are that most of these 14 bills on senior citizens would eventually end up in the archives, the legislative graveyard.

Early last year, Angara was ecstatic when the Supreme Court junked the petition of drug store owners to scrap the 20-percent discount given to senior citizens. 

Then, he saw the need for an amendatory law after receiving thousands of letters from senior citizens complaining about the diminution of their 20-percent discount by the 12-percent value-added tax (VAT). He was one of the authors of the Reformed VAT Law and he stressed that it was never the intention of the law to diminish the discounts enjoyed by senior citizens.

“With the 12-percent VAT, the 20-percent discount given to senior citizens is now down to only 8 percent,” he moaned.

He has filed a bill exempting senior citizens from the coverage of the expanded VAT to reinforce the original intent of his law to give them a 20-percent discount. Senate President Pro-Tempore Jinggoy Estrada has filed a similar bill, Senate Bill No. 1, although he is limiting the exemption from VAT to purchases of medicines.

Angara sees a compelling need to make the senior citizens enjoy the full fruits of the Senior Citizens Law, but he is not very optimistic about the chances of his amen­datory bill becoming a law. He pointed to the opposition of Finance Secretary Margarito Teves. A Cabinet member is an alter ego of the President and the opposition of Teves means that Angara’s bill would most likely face a Ma­lacañang veto.

Concern over revenue losses

Teves was deeply concerned over the revenue losses that the government would incur should the six million senior citizens be exempted from the 12-percent VAT. Teves has been aiming for a balanced budget, and any reduction of the existing revenue sources would make his target harder to achieve. The Bureau of Internal Revenue has failed to meet its collection target for 2007 by P45 billion and the Bureau of Customs, by P12 billion.           

“Teves is a heartless tax collector. Taxation should be a tool for development, not merely for enhancing the government coffers,” Angara said.

Angara ’s bill is not the only measure on senior citizens that Teves has opposed. The Finance secretary also opposed Sen. Loren Legarda’s Senate Bill No. 269 seeking to exempt senior citizens from paying the final 20-percent withholding tax on interest income from their bank deposits.

Legarda said that she filed her bill after noting that RA 7432 and RA 9257 both exempted senior citizens from paying individual income taxes, provided that their annual taxable income does not exceed the poverty level as determined by the National Economic and Development Authority for that year.

“This exemption does not include exemption from payment of the withholding tax on interest income from bank deposits. This failure deprives most of the senior citizens a substantial portion of their income from the interest earnings on their live savings and retirement benefits deposited in banks,” she said.

Legarda said that the DOF should have done the senior citizens a greater service by proposing safeguards against their exploitation by the rich. At the same time, she rejected claims that senior citizens are mainly retirees who go to the banks merely to withdraw their pensions.

“To say that only a fraction of Filipino senior citizens are capable of putting money in the bank is an insult to our elders,” she said.

Legarda has also filed another bill for senior citizens but this does not seek to amend RA 7432 or RA 9257. Her Senate Bill 1394 seeks to provide representation for senior citizens, just like the youths, in local legislative and special bodies.

Senate President Manuel Vil­lar, Senators Chiz Escudero, Miriam Santiago and Bong Revilla have also filed bills to aid senior citizens.

To be continued

   
 

manilablossoms

Gift2Phil

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Ping Oco, Franklin Bartolay
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: