The Manila Times

Regions

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Friday, January 18, 2008

 

Quisumbing wants Palace order on Sumilao land dispute declared null and void

 
THE Supreme Court (SC) was asked by the corporation of the controversial Sumilao land, to reverse the earlier decision of Malacañang that grants the appeal of a farmers’ group for the cancellation of the conversion order of the 144-hectare land in Sumilao, Bukidnon from agricultural to agro-industrial.

In a 50-page petition before the Supreme Court (SC) NQSR (Norberto Quisumbing Sr.) Management and Development Corp. asked the High Court to issue a temporary restraining order against the said Palace order in the Sumilao land dispute.

NSQR owned the 144-hectare parcel of land in San Vicente, Sumilao before it was converted to industrial use which later on was sold to San Miguel Foods Inc. (SMFI) six years ago.

According to the corporation’s lawyer, Atty. Froilan Bacungan, the December 18, 2007 order issued by the Office of the President was with “grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction.”

Included as respondents in the suit were Executive Secretary Eduardo R. Ermita, Agrarian Reform Secretary Nasser Pangandaman and the Mapadayonong Panaghiusa sa mga Lumad Alang sa Damlag (Mapalad).

It was pointed out that Ermita’s decision to revoke the conversion order, in effect, impaired their warranties and undertakings to San Miguel Foods Inc., which formed part of its obligation as a seller of the property, and “opens them to charges that shall be initiated by SMFI.

“The decision [cancelled by Malacañang last December], as upheld by this Honorable Court, forms part of petitioner’s representation, commitment, warranties and undertakings under the Deed of Absolute Sale for the Property that it entered into with private respondent SMFI,” the pleading says.

With this they prayed that the Palace order be declared null and void for being issued with grave abuse of discretion.

It will be recalled that the members of the Mapalad farmers held a 60-day protest march that started on November 17, 2007 from their village in Sumilao to Malacañang to present their appeal to the Chief Executive.

Pangandaman said they will start identifying the qualified beneficiaries for the 144 hectares of land and said the directive of the President was to come out with a “win-win solution” to address the issue.
-- Jomar Canlas

   

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: