The Manila Times

Opinion

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

  Tech Times

 
 
 

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

 

BIG DEAL
By Dan Mariano
Tet Garcia’s people’s initiative

 
The last time anyone tried to tinker with the 1987 Constitution via people’s initiative, the so-called “Charter change” bid was foiled by the Supreme Court. Spearheaded by a lawyer identified with Speaker Jose de Venecia Jr., Cha-cha sought to adopt parliamentary government and further open up the economy to foreigners.

In Lambino v. Comelec, the magistrates ruled that what JDV and company had in mind was not just an amendment, but an outright revision of the Constitution. For this, the tribunal said, a signature campaign would not suffice. Rewriting the basic law of the land requires a full-blown constitutional convention or Congress coming together as a constituent assembly, the court added.

Groups opposed to JDV’s PI were relieved that the Supreme Court did not permit the then-solid ruling coalition to pull a fast one, which they felt would have allowed the administration to remain in power indefinitely. But as the anti-Cha-cha forces celebrated, others detected yet another opportunity for constitutional amendment via a simpler route.

At the Kapihan sa Sulo media forum Saturday, Bataan Gov. Enrique “Tet” Garcia unveiled what he described as a “workable proposal” for Cha-cha through a second PI.

The Union of Local Officials of the Philippines (ULAP), he said, is “seriously considering [another] people’s initiative in proposing amendments to the Constitution to change the present [bicameral] Congress into a unicameral legislative body. That’s all.”

Garcia said that the presidential form of government “shall be maintained to uphold the right of voters to directly elect their chief executive.”

Resistance anticipated

Anticipating resistance from the Senate, he added that “the incumbent senators shall serve in the unicameral body until the end of their respective terms.”

For years Malacañang and its allies have tried to defang the intractable smaller chamber. The senators’ investigations of scandals involving administration figures have made life miserable for the ruling coalition.

 The pro-administration ULAP’s antipathy for the con­trarian Senate is well documented. The governors and mayors loyal to President Arroyo are wont to dismiss the senators’ independence as obstructionism.

Garcia harped on this theme again last weekend: “The shift to merge the present two chambers of Congress into a unicameral body is supported by a vast majority of Filipinos who, according to local executives, have grown weary of legislative gridlock.”

Whether or not the rest of the populace shares ULAP’s dislike for the Senate has yet to be confirmed. In fact, the opposite is apparent.

In last year’s midterm elections, for instance, the local executives’ endorsement of the administration slate failed to stop the opposition from almost sweeping the senatorial race. In opinion polls, individual senators consistently earn high public acceptance ratings, in contrast to the abysmal scores of administration figures—save, of course, for Vice-President Noli de Castro.

What local executives like Garcia regard as “legislative gridlock” may actually be what most Filipinos appreciate the most about the present bicameral legislature—check and balance.

 In a country that has experienced more than its fair share of executive excesses, Garcia needs to convince the public that a unicameral legislature would still be able to curb abuses by the party in power.

Why not an amendment for run-off elections if only to ensure that whoever wins in the 2010 presidential contest is elected with a solid majority?

Since 1987 the multiparty system has produced presidents who could only bank on a plurality of votes, which in turn gave rise to administrations vulnerable to “destabilization.”

Going electric

Mayor Edward Hagedorn of Puerto Princesa is one of a handful of public officials who can be called a true friend of the environment. For instance, his city has relentlessly sought solutions to the air pollution problem caused by the ubiquitous tricycles.

His city council has passed an ordinance that envisions phasing out tricycles running on noisy, smoke-belching two-stroke engines and their replacement with four-stroke powerhouses. Puerto Princesa has also adopted a “color-coding” scheme, which has successfully halved the number of tricycles on the road at any given time.

 Hagedorn has taken his antipollution campaign further by launching “Trikebayan,” which runs on an electric motor that emits no exhaust and generates none of the ear-splitting racket of conventional tricycles.

Designed by Rolando Concepcion, the Trikebayan is powered by electric batteries that can be recharged in any household 220-volt outlet for about four hours.

Converting the two-stroke gasoline engine of a conventional tricycle to a Trikebayan would cost about P65,000—a hefty sum for ordinary tricycle operators and drivers. But Hagedorn said his city has devised a financing scheme to help encourage the mass conversion of the most popular form of public transport in Puerto Princesa.

Now, if only our other local officials were just as innovative and environment-friendly...

   
 

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Manila Times Friends

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

 
 
 


Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin.

  

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: