The Manila Times

Business

  Home  

  About Us  

  Contact Us 

  Subscribe     Advertise  
  Archives     Feedback  

  Register  

  Help  

  Top Stories

  Metro

  Business

  Regions

  Opinion

  World

  Life & Times

  Sports

 

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

 
MANAGING FOR SOCIETY
By Benito L. Teehankee
Sex and billboards Part II

 
(Continued from last week)

As I argued in last week’s column, the first problem with sexual images in billboards is that they are essentially not informative and, worse, psychologically manipulative. Thus, they fail to meet the requirements of legitimate advertising and mass media.

Plato has been quoted as saying that “the body intrudes … into our investigations, interrupting, disturbing, distracting, and preventing us from getting a glimpse of the truth.” More recently, psychologists have been analyzing the impact of psychological manipulation in sexual advertising or what they neutrally term as “sex appeals.” They have found that while sex appeals improved the viewers’ positive thoughts about and recall of the advertising message, this came at a price to the viewer. Sex appeals tend to interfere with thoughts about the product and the message as well as inhibit counter-arguments in the mind of the viewer. In short, sex appeals short-circuit the mind’s natural rationality and replace this with positive feelings associated with sexual imagery.

A second issue that has been raised against sexual images in advertising, and which applies more strongly to billboards, is that they send essentially unnatural and, as a result, demeaning messages. Business ethicist John Cohan argues that such ads “redefine attractiveness from something natural to an unattainable ideal.” The utter artificial flawlessness of human bodies in 50-foot billboards implies an essentially demeaning and manipulative message. Jacobson and Mazur argue that “by inviting women to compare their unimproved reality with [such] … perfection, advertising erodes self-esteem, then offers to sell it back—for a price.”

Thus, this style of advertising dissuades against the cultivation of inner beauty. Not surprisingly, such ads have cultivated the desire of women to aspire for mythical standards of beauty, which are often only possible through costly, and sometimes dangerous, surgical intervention. The reported cases of disfigurement, injuries and death related to cosmetic surgery operations in the country is an inevitable result of this obsession with an unattainable physical beauty propagated in part by sexual advertising.

 A third ethical objection against sex-oriented billboards is that they erode traditional conventions of virtue and modesty among women and, therefore, slowly undermine the country’s social fabric. Women, because of their tender qualities and crucial nurturing roles in the family and in the community, have always been afforded a high level of respect in Philippine society. Although we have come a long way from the Maria Clara ideal, Filipina women are still raised in the exercise of virtues such as modesty and prudence. These are not trivial considerations for a society, which values the family and the raising of upright children. By extolling immodesty in the highways of the land, these billboards are conditioning the young generation to forget traditional community values.

A final and practical problem is that these billboards pose a safety threat to the motoring public. Billboards, of course, rely on their ability to attract attention and, therefore, send a message. But sexual images attract attention much longer than necessary for the message to be sent. The driver who understandably lingers too long to take in the alluring images may find himself in a collision before he knows it. These billboards are found in highways, after all, where high speeds are to be expected. Shouldn’t considerations of public safety override the commercial interests of companies?

Companies should take care not to let their pursuit of profit override their basic sense of decency and concern for the community. Perhaps, in specific contexts and for exclusively mature audiences, nudity has a place in advertising. But it doesn’t belong in billboards.

___

Dr. Ben Teehankee is an associate professor at th e Ramon V. del Rosario Sr. Graduate School of Business, College of Business and Economics at De La Salle University-Manila. His e-mail address is teehankeeb@dlsu.edu.ph.

  
 

Manila Times Friends

Phgifts

philflora.gif

Sponsored Links
 

Back To Top

Severino O. Frayna Jr., Benjie Dela Rosa
Powered by: 
The Manila Times Web Admin

 

Home | About Us | Contact | Subscribe | Advertise | Feedback | Archives | Help

  Copyright (c) 2001 The Manila Times | Terms of Service
The Manila Times Publishing Corp. All rights reserved.

Hosted by: